<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Mini 4.1 due out this week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dstorey</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73823</link>
		<dc:creator>dstorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73823</guid>
		<description>With risk of hijacking this thread further, I didn't want to post here about Opera Dragonfly.  As I was working on the launch of Opera Dragonfly, the information wouldn't exactly be coming from a neautral source, plus I'd already written about Opera Dragonfly coming soon on this blog no so long before.  I also write for my own blog, CSS3.info and the new Opera Dragonfly blog, and the copy for the Opera Dragonfly web site, so if I posted it'd just be rehashing of information that is already out there.  I prefere not to reword what I've alread wrote a few times already, and get some fresh input from someone not as close to the release, that can say how they see it from an outsiders aspect.  

I will try to post on here when we have some new information to share however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With risk of hijacking this thread further, I didn&#8217;t want to post here about Opera Dragonfly.  As I was working on the launch of Opera Dragonfly, the information wouldn&#8217;t exactly be coming from a neautral source, plus I&#8217;d already written about Opera Dragonfly coming soon on this blog no so long before.  I also write for my own blog, CSS3.info and the new Opera Dragonfly blog, and the copy for the Opera Dragonfly web site, so if I posted it&#8217;d just be rehashing of information that is already out there.  I prefere not to reword what I&#8217;ve alread wrote a few times already, and get some fresh input from someone not as close to the release, that can say how they see it from an outsiders aspect.  </p>
<p>I will try to post on here when we have some new information to share however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAMAToNE</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73819</link>
		<dc:creator>BAMAToNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73819</guid>
		<description>@test, Dane: Like Daniel, most of us have full time jobs as well. I can only speak for myself when I say I chose not to blog about Dragonfly because I did not keep up with exactly what it could do. Developer tools are not my forte, and so I did not want to write about it and risk giving out inaccurate information (or just sounding stupid :P ). You are right, though, that one of us should have at least mentioned its release here. Which leads to my last point: This "blogging by committee" approach is still new us. Give us some time to work out the kinks! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@test, Dane: Like Daniel, most of us have full time jobs as well. I can only speak for myself when I say I chose not to blog about Dragonfly because I did not keep up with exactly what it could do. Developer tools are not my forte, and so I did not want to write about it and risk giving out inaccurate information (or just sounding stupid <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ). You are right, though, that one of us should have at least mentioned its release here. Which leads to my last point: This &#8220;blogging by committee&#8221; approach is still new us. Give us some time to work out the kinks! <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73818</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73818</guid>
		<description>Dane, sorry to disappoint you. I can't speak for the other bloggers, but I have a full time job, and don't have much time for blogging on Opera Watch. Having said that, I hope for Opera Watch to pick up on the posting rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dane, sorry to disappoint you. I can&#8217;t speak for the other bloggers, but I have a full time job, and don&#8217;t have much time for blogging on Opera Watch. Having said that, I hope for Opera Watch to pick up on the posting rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73817</guid>
		<description>yeah, seriously, when Daniel was the single admin of the site, there were almost daily or at least weekly updates, now when there are 6 bloggers it seems Opera Watch is just rehashing the infrequent Opera's press releases...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, seriously, when Daniel was the single admin of the site, there were almost daily or at least weekly updates, now when there are 6 bloggers it seems Opera Watch is just rehashing the infrequent Opera&#8217;s press releases&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: test</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73816</link>
		<dc:creator>test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73816</guid>
		<description>why wasn't dragonfly announced here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why wasn&#8217;t dragonfly announced here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nakwan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73814</link>
		<dc:creator>nakwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73814</guid>
		<description>like the black skin too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like the black skin too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: algarcia</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/05/opera-mini-41-due-out-this-week.html#comment-73813</link>
		<dc:creator>algarcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1875#comment-73813</guid>
		<description>what about the skins? i loved on previous versions when we could change the red skin so the black one! is that ever coming back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the skins? i loved on previous versions when we could change the red skin so the black one! is that ever coming back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
