<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Dragonfly alpha almost ready</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam P</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73857</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73857</guid>
		<description>The alpha of Dragonfly is now available for download: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opera.com/products/dragonfly/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.opera.com/products/dragonfly&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The alpha of Dragonfly is now available for download: <a href="http://www.opera.com/products/dragonfly/">http://www.opera.com/products/dragonfly</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David DeCarmine</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73792</link>
		<dc:creator>David DeCarmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73792</guid>
		<description>They were excited about it. They probably put a lot of effort into creating it and they wanted people to get as excited as them about it. People have been requesting Developer Tools for a while, so for something to finally come out is a pretty big event for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were excited about it. They probably put a lot of effort into creating it and they wanted people to get as excited as them about it. People have been requesting Developer Tools for a while, so for something to finally come out is a pretty big event for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seamus</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73749</link>
		<dc:creator>Seamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73749</guid>
		<description>Was the hype and teasers really needed for a developer tool? I am totally glad to have such a s tool on Opera. But really, why the tease?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the hype and teasers really needed for a developer tool? I am totally glad to have such a s tool on Opera. But really, why the tease?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Baker</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73688</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73688</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used Firebug in the past, but I can&#039;t wait for Dragonfly!

Dragonfly will be successful (IMO) if it is initially feature rich, mapped out well (or well for an alpha release), and is remotely stable. I think everyone will expect it to have it&#039;s quirks (being an alpha and all), but the initial impression will be the seller or deal closer. It has to look and feel promising.

I&#039;m sure I won&#039;t have to worry about that since it&#039;s still an Opera product! Thanks David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Firebug in the past, but I can&#8217;t wait for Dragonfly!</p>
<p>Dragonfly will be successful (IMO) if it is initially feature rich, mapped out well (or well for an alpha release), and is remotely stable. I think everyone will expect it to have it&#8217;s quirks (being an alpha and all), but the initial impression will be the seller or deal closer. It has to look and feel promising.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I won&#8217;t have to worry about that since it&#8217;s still an Opera product! Thanks David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73685</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73685</guid>
		<description>musiKk, the Firebug 1.1 beta at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getfirebug.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;getfirebug.com&lt;/a&gt; works with Firefox 3.  I haven&#039;t had any problems with it myself.

That said, I&#039;m thrilled that Opera will soon have its own development tools.  Some tools are essentially browser-independent, but there are going to be differences in implementations, and a browser-specific tool can make it &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; easier to explain the &quot;Browser X displays it this way, but browser Y displays it that way!&quot; problem by showing exactly what that browser sees.  (It&#039;s not easy to debug an IE-specific problem with Firebug, for instance!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>musiKk, the Firebug 1.1 beta at <a href="http://www.getfirebug.com/">getfirebug.com</a> works with Firefox 3.  I haven&#8217;t had any problems with it myself.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m thrilled that Opera will soon have its own development tools.  Some tools are essentially browser-independent, but there are going to be differences in implementations, and a browser-specific tool can make it <em>much</em> easier to explain the &#8220;Browser X displays it this way, but browser Y displays it that way!&#8221; problem by showing exactly what that browser sees.  (It&#8217;s not easy to debug an IE-specific problem with Firebug, for instance!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musiKk</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73682</link>
		<dc:creator>musiKk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73682</guid>
		<description>Funny thing, I just upgraded to Ubuntu Hardy Heron and Firefox 3 broke the Firebug plugin and now I read this. Must be a sign.

Of course I only used it for debugging browser incompatibilities. Apart from that it&#039;s Opera forever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing, I just upgraded to Ubuntu Hardy Heron and Firefox 3 broke the Firebug plugin and now I read this. Must be a sign.</p>
<p>Of course I only used it for debugging browser incompatibilities. Apart from that it&#8217;s Opera forever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucas</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/opera-dragonfly-alpha-almost-ready.html/comment-page-1#comment-73681</link>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1873#comment-73681</guid>
		<description>good i wait dragonfly

que legal vou esperar o dragonfly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good i wait dragonfly</p>
<p>que legal vou esperar o dragonfly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
