<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to remove a (mis)typed-in address in Opera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian P</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-74058</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-74058</guid>
		<description>I know this is late to the party but I had the same problem of 'phantom' addresses getting retained in the history.  I cleared all history/cache items in the browser but when entering an address in the address bar, it still would try to use the 'guess-ahead' feature and tons of years-old address were still present.  Ex: After typing "a", it would bring up a list of tons of addresses with "a" in it.  Here's what I found:

1) I uninstalled, removed all opera program directories, reinstalled and still had the problem.  So, after doing an uninstall, I ended up having to go to the app data directory (C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\ AND C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Application Data) and delete the Opera directory.  
2) After deleting ALL opera data from both the program directory and the app-data directories and reinstalling, the phantom history entries no longer appeared.
3) All bookmarks are included in this 'history search' list.  I didn't realize that at first.  Upon a fresh install bookmarks are imported from IE / FireFox and thus I was seeing addresses even on a new install.  But, I was now only seeing bookmarks and not year-old entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is late to the party but I had the same problem of &#8216;phantom&#8217; addresses getting retained in the history.  I cleared all history/cache items in the browser but when entering an address in the address bar, it still would try to use the &#8216;guess-ahead&#8217; feature and tons of years-old address were still present.  Ex: After typing &#8220;a&#8221;, it would bring up a list of tons of addresses with &#8220;a&#8221; in it.  Here&#8217;s what I found:</p>
<p>1) I uninstalled, removed all opera program directories, reinstalled and still had the problem.  So, after doing an uninstall, I ended up having to go to the app data directory (C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\ AND C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Application Data) and delete the Opera directory.<br />
2) After deleting ALL opera data from both the program directory and the app-data directories and reinstalling, the phantom history entries no longer appeared.<br />
3) All bookmarks are included in this &#8216;history search&#8217; list.  I didn&#8217;t realize that at first.  Upon a fresh install bookmarks are imported from IE / FireFox and thus I was seeing addresses even on a new install.  But, I was now only seeing bookmarks and not year-old entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorne</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73919</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73919</guid>
		<description>I think it may have something to do with the bookmarks, so I think that's why it never went away. It's a mistake on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it may have something to do with the bookmarks, so I think that&#8217;s why it never went away. It&#8217;s a mistake on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73696</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73696</guid>
		<description>@Maria

the ghost addresses is a very remote problem, in my case, probably due to two opera installations on the same machine (a proper release and a beta version) at the same time.
As well as I can see, the ghost history dates to that time.

I'm pretty confident that the current version of opera, with a normal simple installation, will give you the privacy satisfaction that you need. 

You just have to test it, you know, check if it's not keeping this history, so you can put your fears to rest. Opera is a major browser, and of great quality. This is a pretty remote bug and I'm convinced this issue (whatever it is) doesn't exist anymore, at least, for the logging part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Maria</p>
<p>the ghost addresses is a very remote problem, in my case, probably due to two opera installations on the same machine (a proper release and a beta version) at the same time.<br />
As well as I can see, the ghost history dates to that time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty confident that the current version of opera, with a normal simple installation, will give you the privacy satisfaction that you need. </p>
<p>You just have to test it, you know, check if it&#8217;s not keeping this history, so you can put your fears to rest. Opera is a major browser, and of great quality. This is a pretty remote bug and I&#8217;m convinced this issue (whatever it is) doesn&#8217;t exist anymore, at least, for the logging part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73687</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73687</guid>
		<description>Dorne and Marc-O, I'd just downloaded Opera to test my updated webpages with before putting them online (trying for as much browser compatibility as I can), but after reading of this ghost address problem that some people have, I'm *not* going to install Opera after all. I have nothing to hide and no top-secret files (and zero porno stuff or anything else controversial), but still the idea of Opera keeping things for years that can't be erased short of a total hard-drive format or something, is just too creepy.

I did previously (last year, on a different computer, long since reformatted) test my pages with an older version of Opera, and that will have to suffice as far as browser compatibility goes.

I don't want it on my new computer if it keeps records that can't be deleted.

Okay maybe I'm a little paranoid, but this past year of trying to get used to all the security things in Windows (and Linux too, I don't see much difference between them -- they're both very complicated OS's and they both have ridiculously HUGE numbers of mysteriously-named files just to run the OS) is bad enough as it is, compared to the ancient primitive OS's I was previously accustomed to for many years, where the user had pretty much control of what info was stored, and files (even "invisible" files on antique Macs) were easily able to be deleted, even by relatively non-expert users, if they chose to do so.  If there were a way to delete this "ghost" stuff in Opera (running under Windows) I'd go ahead and install it. Otherwise, not. Dorne and Marc-O seem to indicate that the problem can't be solved.

Well I guess I won't be testing my site's webpages for Opera compatibility then. Maybe it doesn't matter, as the pages validate to W3C specs with no errors and the HTML code is relatively simple anyway (no Javascript, no fancy stuff) but it would have been nice to test the sliced images etc., for compatibility with new versions of Opera. (I use sliced images as part of a somewhat admittedly simple-minded strategy to make it just a little bit less easy for low-life thieves to hotlink my images and steal my bandwidth, used in combination with .htaccess -- unless they want to steal the whole code, but I haven't seen anyone motivated/ non-lazy enough to try that yet).

I suppose I'll have to rely on Browsercam or something, for Opera compatibility-checking. I've never personally known anyone who used Opera anyway, and I haven't had an Opera browser show up in my web logs user-agent thing in many years, but I do like to maintain compatibility with as many browsers (both old ones *and* the very newest ones too) as possible, just for the principle of the thing if nothing else.

I've never been too thrilled about sites that only work in one or two browsers, but break in other browsers. That's not what the web should be about.

Maria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dorne and Marc-O, I&#8217;d just downloaded Opera to test my updated webpages with before putting them online (trying for as much browser compatibility as I can), but after reading of this ghost address problem that some people have, I&#8217;m *not* going to install Opera after all. I have nothing to hide and no top-secret files (and zero porno stuff or anything else controversial), but still the idea of Opera keeping things for years that can&#8217;t be erased short of a total hard-drive format or something, is just too creepy.</p>
<p>I did previously (last year, on a different computer, long since reformatted) test my pages with an older version of Opera, and that will have to suffice as far as browser compatibility goes.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want it on my new computer if it keeps records that can&#8217;t be deleted.</p>
<p>Okay maybe I&#8217;m a little paranoid, but this past year of trying to get used to all the security things in Windows (and Linux too, I don&#8217;t see much difference between them &#8212; they&#8217;re both very complicated OS&#8217;s and they both have ridiculously HUGE numbers of mysteriously-named files just to run the OS) is bad enough as it is, compared to the ancient primitive OS&#8217;s I was previously accustomed to for many years, where the user had pretty much control of what info was stored, and files (even &#8220;invisible&#8221; files on antique Macs) were easily able to be deleted, even by relatively non-expert users, if they chose to do so.  If there were a way to delete this &#8220;ghost&#8221; stuff in Opera (running under Windows) I&#8217;d go ahead and install it. Otherwise, not. Dorne and Marc-O seem to indicate that the problem can&#8217;t be solved.</p>
<p>Well I guess I won&#8217;t be testing my site&#8217;s webpages for Opera compatibility then. Maybe it doesn&#8217;t matter, as the pages validate to W3C specs with no errors and the HTML code is relatively simple anyway (no Javascript, no fancy stuff) but it would have been nice to test the sliced images etc., for compatibility with new versions of Opera. (I use sliced images as part of a somewhat admittedly simple-minded strategy to make it just a little bit less easy for low-life thieves to hotlink my images and steal my bandwidth, used in combination with .htaccess &#8212; unless they want to steal the whole code, but I haven&#8217;t seen anyone motivated/ non-lazy enough to try that yet).</p>
<p>I suppose I&#8217;ll have to rely on Browsercam or something, for Opera compatibility-checking. I&#8217;ve never personally known anyone who used Opera anyway, and I haven&#8217;t had an Opera browser show up in my web logs user-agent thing in many years, but I do like to maintain compatibility with as many browsers (both old ones *and* the very newest ones too) as possible, just for the principle of the thing if nothing else.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been too thrilled about sites that only work in one or two browsers, but break in other browsers. That&#8217;s not what the web should be about.</p>
<p>Maria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorne</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73641</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73641</guid>
		<description>I see. What me and Marc-O have is a different problem altogether. We have ghost addresses that do linger after clearing history of visited pages. Wierd..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. What me and Marc-O have is a different problem altogether. We have ghost addresses that do linger after clearing history of visited pages. Wierd..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73640</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73640</guid>
		<description>@GT500

did it all. All clean - but no change, I still see the ghost addresses.

next step is to grep all my HD....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GT500</p>
<p>did it all. All clean - but no change, I still see the ghost addresses.</p>
<p>next step is to grep all my HD&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamil</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73636</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73636</guid>
		<description>@Dorne: Clear history of visited pages</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dorne: Clear history of visited pages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorne</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73635</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73635</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I have no addresses in the dir file, but if you press one letter, say e, there is still some addresses I can't delete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I have no addresses in the dir file, but if you press one letter, say e, there is still some addresses I can&#8217;t delete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73627</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73627</guid>
		<description>Thanks GT500...

but

did all of that, and still these ghost urls are hanging around... From what I see, these are about two years old, so that would put me with.... version 8/8.5 perhaps?

I think the last option will be to grep all my HD with some of the urls to find where these are located!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks GT500&#8230;</p>
<p>but</p>
<p>did all of that, and still these ghost urls are hanging around&#8230; From what I see, these are about two years old, so that would put me with&#8230;. version 8/8.5 perhaps?</p>
<p>I think the last option will be to grep all my HD with some of the urls to find where these are located!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT500</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73604</link>
		<dc:creator>GT500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73604</guid>
		<description>Marc-O, Opera stores it's history in a file named global.dat. Just delete that file, and delete opera.dir, and you shouldn't have any more things hidden in your history. You might also be able to use the "Delete Private Data" tool (available in the "Tools" menu).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc-O, Opera stores it&#8217;s history in a file named global.dat. Just delete that file, and delete opera.dir, and you shouldn&#8217;t have any more things hidden in your history. You might also be able to use the &#8220;Delete Private Data&#8221; tool (available in the &#8220;Tools&#8221; menu).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73591</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73591</guid>
		<description>Is there another place where address information is kept? I have this recurring issue that some old (two years old) addresses are kept, and even after I clean history and cache... they still remains. I think it's got to do with some beta version I once installed, but I still haven't found it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there another place where address information is kept? I have this recurring issue that some old (two years old) addresses are kept, and even after I clean history and cache&#8230; they still remains. I think it&#8217;s got to do with some beta version I once installed, but I still haven&#8217;t found it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barker</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73588</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73588</guid>
		<description>I'm not that browser proud. Give it a week or two and its fallen off the bottom!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not that browser proud. Give it a week or two and its fallen off the bottom!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ff</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73576</link>
		<dc:creator>ff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73576</guid>
		<description>this post is really an anti-tip. it is 2008 not 1989, and people hate when someone asks them to go to somewhere, edit somewhere etc. showing that is showing Opera weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this post is really an anti-tip. it is 2008 not 1989, and people hate when someone asks them to go to somewhere, edit somewhere etc. showing that is showing Opera weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT500</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73573</link>
		<dc:creator>GT500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73573</guid>
		<description>Now people think that Daniel has turned Operawatch over to Tamil. This is kind of humorous... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now people think that Daniel has turned Operawatch over to Tamil. This is kind of humorous&#8230; <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suribe</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2008/04/how-to-remove-a-typed-in-address-in-opera.html#comment-73571</link>
		<dc:creator>suribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/?p=1863#comment-73571</guid>
		<description>this is the perfect place for Tamil: WELCOME!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the perfect place for Tamil: WELCOME!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
