<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congrats to the IE team on IE8&#8217;s passing of the Acid2 test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Øyvind Ø</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-72010</link>
		<dc:creator>Øyvind Ø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-72010</guid>
		<description>The messed up picture is supposed to look like that smiley. The smiley you see is just a picture of what the smiley should look like it your browser knew what it was doing.

But looks like we congratulated the IE team too soon. If today's decision is final, IE will never pass the Acid 2 test. Maybe we should just call CSS2 for IE7 instead, and then change the recommendations accordingly :(


- ØØ -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The messed up picture is supposed to look like that smiley. The smiley you see is just a picture of what the smiley should look like it your browser knew what it was doing.</p>
<p>But looks like we congratulated the IE team too soon. If today&#8217;s decision is final, IE will never pass the Acid 2 test. Maybe we should just call CSS2 for IE7 instead, and then change the recommendations accordingly <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>- ØØ -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-71983</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-71983</guid>
		<description>Okay, I'm confused. I am using a browser, its the AT&#38;T/SBC Yahoo! one. I'm not sure what the second picture on the Acid 2 test is supposed to look like. I went to the website, took it, and ended with a similar picture to the IE8 one. What is the messed-up picture supposed to look like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m confused. I am using a browser, its the AT&amp;T/SBC Yahoo! one. I&#8217;m not sure what the second picture on the Acid 2 test is supposed to look like. I went to the website, took it, and ended with a similar picture to the IE8 one. What is the messed-up picture supposed to look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70708</link>
		<dc:creator>w2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 07:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70708</guid>
		<description>and you DO like to change your nicknames, and UA strings, nelson. double standards it seems, as Daniel does nothing with it.


and btw. you saing something is FAR from refuting anything. youll have to do better, like you know, provide facts, not opera press relases.

"ANd there are lots of examples of similar things in Firefox."

difference is, firefox has 20-40% marketshare and somehow it always, in gray areas, goes the IE-way, just to avoid troubles. and it is your first chance to say something different than opera press relases - if there are lots, state at least 5. until then - please be quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and you DO like to change your nicknames, and UA strings, nelson. double standards it seems, as Daniel does nothing with it.</p>
<p>and btw. you saing something is FAR from refuting anything. youll have to do better, like you know, provide facts, not opera press relases.</p>
<p>&#8220;ANd there are lots of examples of similar things in Firefox.&#8221;</p>
<p>difference is, firefox has 20-40% marketshare and somehow it always, in gray areas, goes the IE-way, just to avoid troubles. and it is your first chance to say something different than opera press relases - if there are lots, state at least 5. until then - please be quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w3</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70686</link>
		<dc:creator>w3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 02:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70686</guid>
		<description>The difference is that you keep changing the subject after your claims have been refuted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is that you keep changing the subject after your claims have been refuted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70562</link>
		<dc:creator>w2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70562</guid>
		<description>http://www.officelive.com/

try this link in opera, try it in firefox. see a difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.officelive.com/">http://www.officelive.com/</a></p>
<p>try this link in opera, try it in firefox. see a difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70489</link>
		<dc:creator>w2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70489</guid>
		<description>you need only one part of a website to fail in a browser to make it 'browser A uncompatible'

yes, you can read digg's main page, no, you cant use 100% of its functionality, same goes with deviantart

and as for the validator, operawatch.com also fails now, due to wrong object placement in the code. so what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you need only one part of a website to fail in a browser to make it &#8216;browser A uncompatible&#8217;</p>
<p>yes, you can read digg&#8217;s main page, no, you cant use 100% of its functionality, same goes with deviantart</p>
<p>and as for the validator, operawatch.com also fails now, due to wrong object placement in the code. so what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70480</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70480</guid>
		<description>dont know about devianart but digg works great in opera also digg is a lot faster for me in opera than in firefox or ie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont know about devianart but digg works great in opera also digg is a lot faster for me in opera than in firefox or ie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crazy</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70477</link>
		<dc:creator>Crazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70477</guid>
		<description>Not only do they not fail in Opera, but they also don't validate. They are far from standards compliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only do they not fail in Opera, but they also don&#8217;t validate. They are far from standards compliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadd</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70474</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70474</guid>
		<description>Digg and devianart fail? No they don't. They work fine in Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg and devianart fail? No they don&#8217;t. They work fine in Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w3</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70434</link>
		<dc:creator>w3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70434</guid>
		<description>"but they work in FF, so they werent designed in ie-only approach. and if FF can manage to serve them well, why opera cant?"

The main reasons are:

1. Web designers always designed for both IE and Netscape back in the day. When the new Gecko based Netscape was released (before Firefox), lots of sites updated to support it because they were used to doing so with NS4. Firefox could simply "freeload" off of this.

2. Market share.

"maybe because opera insists to go its own path, instead of following the bigger brothers?"

This is obviously false since Opera by their own statements work actively on compatibility. Opera supports a huge number of things just be compatible with other browsers, such as document.all.

"want examples? why JS date format is different in opera?"

You'll have to do better than that. ANd there are lots of examples of similar things in Firefox.

"both digg and deviantart are coded with standards in mind, both fail at some point in opera. care to explain?"

Neither of these are even close to standards compliant.

Sorry, but again you'll have to do better than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but they work in FF, so they werent designed in ie-only approach. and if FF can manage to serve them well, why opera cant?&#8221;</p>
<p>The main reasons are:</p>
<p>1. Web designers always designed for both IE and Netscape back in the day. When the new Gecko based Netscape was released (before Firefox), lots of sites updated to support it because they were used to doing so with NS4. Firefox could simply &#8220;freeload&#8221; off of this.</p>
<p>2. Market share.</p>
<p>&#8220;maybe because opera insists to go its own path, instead of following the bigger brothers?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is obviously false since Opera by their own statements work actively on compatibility. Opera supports a huge number of things just be compatible with other browsers, such as document.all.</p>
<p>&#8220;want examples? why JS date format is different in opera?&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have to do better than that. ANd there are lots of examples of similar things in Firefox.</p>
<p>&#8220;both digg and deviantart are coded with standards in mind, both fail at some point in opera. care to explain?&#8221;</p>
<p>Neither of these are even close to standards compliant.</p>
<p>Sorry, but again you&#8217;ll have to do better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70411</link>
		<dc:creator>w2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70411</guid>
		<description>"If they were designed for standards they would work in Opera."

both digg and deviantart are coded with standards in mind, both fail at some point in opera. care to explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If they were designed for standards they would work in Opera.&#8221;</p>
<p>both digg and deviantart are coded with standards in mind, both fail at some point in opera. care to explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70410</link>
		<dc:creator>w2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70410</guid>
		<description>but they work in FF, so they werent designed in ie-only approach. and if FF can manage to serve them well, why opera cant?

maybe because opera insists to go its own path, instead of following the bigger brothers? (in gray areas, that are quite common in w3c 'standards')

want examples? why JS date format is different in opera? even wandered what are the implications for this? there are tens if not more of such things opera did upstream, asking itself for inevitable troubles. and now it is 'ie only coding'? BS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but they work in FF, so they werent designed in ie-only approach. and if FF can manage to serve them well, why opera cant?</p>
<p>maybe because opera insists to go its own path, instead of following the bigger brothers? (in gray areas, that are quite common in w3c &#8217;standards&#8217;)</p>
<p>want examples? why JS date format is different in opera? even wandered what are the implications for this? there are tens if not more of such things opera did upstream, asking itself for inevitable troubles. and now it is &#8216;ie only coding&#8217;? BS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfff</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70409</link>
		<dc:creator>mfff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70409</guid>
		<description>Ehud

Opera's biggest problems is that sites aren't working. Sites aren't working because they are designed for IE and not standards. If they were designed for standards they would work in Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehud</p>
<p>Opera&#8217;s biggest problems is that sites aren&#8217;t working. Sites aren&#8217;t working because they are designed for IE and not standards. If they were designed for standards they would work in Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daiwai</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70408</link>
		<dc:creator>Daiwai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70408</guid>
		<description>@ Ehud it would actually be an advantage over the current situation for Opera, as they would only have to implement one version (that of the W3C) of each standard instead of also having to emulate IE quirks mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ehud it would actually be an advantage over the current situation for Opera, as they would only have to implement one version (that of the W3C) of each standard instead of also having to emulate IE quirks mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehud</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70401</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/12/congrats-to-the-ie-team-on-ie8s-passing-of-the-acid2-test.html#comment-70401</guid>
		<description>Let's just say the already dominant IE complies FULLY to web standards- sometime in the (hypothetical) future. How, then, will Opera make up all that lost ground (in terms of usage stats) between them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s just say the already dominant IE complies FULLY to web standards- sometime in the (hypothetical) future. How, then, will Opera make up all that lost ground (in terms of usage stats) between them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
