<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Widgets in Joost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arve Bersvendsen</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68956</link>
		<dc:creator>Arve Bersvendsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68956</guid>
		<description>Just to point out an inaccuracy: Opera does &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; follow the w3c widgets draft (Oct. 13, 2007) Daniel linked to. Nobody does, as the w3c widget specification is currently under heavy development, and anyone implementing the specification must expect the spec to change from under their feet.

What Opera however &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt;, was to provide the initial input to the w3c, in the form of a specification that exactly matches Opera&#039;s implementation.  The implementation that is very close to being a one-to-one match with Opera&#039;s implementation is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-widgets-20061109/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;November 2006&lt;/a&gt; draft.

Regards, Arve (editor of internal Opera widget specification).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to point out an inaccuracy: Opera does <em>not</em> follow the w3c widgets draft (Oct. 13, 2007) Daniel linked to. Nobody does, as the w3c widget specification is currently under heavy development, and anyone implementing the specification must expect the spec to change from under their feet.</p>
<p>What Opera however <em>did</em>, was to provide the initial input to the w3c, in the form of a specification that exactly matches Opera&#8217;s implementation.  The implementation that is very close to being a one-to-one match with Opera&#8217;s implementation is the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-widgets-20061109/">November 2006</a> draft.</p>
<p>Regards, Arve (editor of internal Opera widget specification).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Im Straight</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68940</link>
		<dc:creator>Im Straight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68940</guid>
		<description>OMG who the heck wants widgets in Joost!!!!??? What the heck is up with this widget crap anyway? Widget in opera, widgets in joost, yahoo widgets, next I&#039;ll go to mcdonalds and they will ask &quot;Would you like widgets with that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG who the heck wants widgets in Joost!!!!??? What the heck is up with this widget <acronym title="crap">****</acronym> anyway? Widget in opera, widgets in joost, yahoo widgets, next I&#8217;ll go to mcdonalds and they will ask &#8220;Would you like widgets with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68918</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68918</guid>
		<description>Dan,
thanks  alot, Opera Widgets are working now :) Neat!
But they seem to have some issues with transparency and images. Ffor example in the analog clock widget (http://widgets.opera.com/widget/3529/) looks a bit strange in Joost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
thanks  alot, Opera Widgets are working now <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Neat!<br />
But they seem to have some issues with transparency and images. Ffor example in the analog clock widget (<a href="http://widgets.opera.com/widget/3529/">http://widgets.opera.com/widget/3529/</a>) looks a bit strange in Joost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68907</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68907</guid>
		<description>Nice nice, gonna try this tomorrow..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice nice, gonna try this tomorrow..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brickley</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68883</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68883</guid>
		<description>Mathias - are you running the bleeding edge previous release? See links from http://blogs.joost.com/dev/2007/11/first_preview_release.html ... earlier versions didn&#039;t understand the opera/w3c stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathias &#8211; are you running the bleeding edge previous release? See links from <a href="http://blogs.joost.com/dev/2007/11/first_preview_release.html">http://blogs.joost.com/dev/2007/11/first_preview_release.html</a> &#8230; earlier versions didn&#8217;t understand the opera/w3c stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68880</guid>
		<description>Cool idea, it doesnt seem to work for me though. I&#039;m using Joost on Windows and can&#039;t install Opera-Widgets, neither from the web nor from a local zip file. Neither renaming it to joda nor the &quot;?force=1&quot; help :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool idea, it doesnt seem to work for me though. I&#8217;m using Joost on Windows and can&#8217;t install Opera-Widgets, neither from the web nor from a local zip file. Neither renaming it to joda nor the &#8220;?force=1&#8243; help :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68876</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68876</guid>
		<description>Dan, thanks. I&#039;ll take a look at it tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, thanks. I&#8217;ll take a look at it tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brickley</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68873</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68873</guid>
		<description>Hi there.

OK quick instructions:

I&#039;m running Joost now in MacOSX. I grab the URL http://widgets.opera.com/widget/download/4860/1.0/?force=1 from the blog post linked above, ... go into Joost and the right hand side of the screen (&quot;My Joost&quot;). Then in the Widget Menu, find the Widget Manager (hmm you might need to enable this in the Advanced Preferences). I think you either need to append ?force=1 or go find the direct URL to .zip in a Web browser, rather than use the main Widget page URL, currently.

In Widget Manager you can load Joost widgets via a file dialog, and Joost or Opera via pasting an URL into the bar near bottom of the screen then press &quot;Add Widget&quot;. It can take a few seconds to download,  unpack and install a widget. If I press ctrl/shift/D I can see the debug console, which is helpful for those widgets that don&#039;t work. 

Going thru that routine, I found the URL didn&#039;t always display in the textarea (hey this is a developer preview release :) but if the widget manager is closed and re-opened, it displays ok.

Yes this is a bit involved right now, but ... it&#039;s progress! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.</p>
<p>OK quick instructions:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running Joost now in MacOSX. I grab the URL <a href="http://widgets.opera.com/widget/download/4860/1.0/?force=1">http://widgets.opera.com/widget/download/4860/1.0/?force=1</a> from the blog post linked above, &#8230; go into Joost and the right hand side of the screen (&#8221;My Joost&#8221;). Then in the Widget Menu, find the Widget Manager (hmm you might need to enable this in the Advanced Preferences). I think you either need to append ?force=1 or go find the direct URL to .zip in a Web browser, rather than use the main Widget page URL, currently.</p>
<p>In Widget Manager you can load Joost widgets via a file dialog, and Joost or Opera via pasting an URL into the bar near bottom of the screen then press &#8220;Add Widget&#8221;. It can take a few seconds to download,  unpack and install a widget. If I press ctrl/shift/D I can see the debug console, which is helpful for those widgets that don&#8217;t work. </p>
<p>Going thru that routine, I found the URL didn&#8217;t always display in the textarea (hey this is a developer preview release <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but if the widget manager is closed and re-opened, it displays ok.</p>
<p>Yes this is a bit involved right now, but &#8230; it&#8217;s progress! <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68872</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68872</guid>
		<description>yeeliberto, Mac OS X doesn&#039;t follow the W3C widget standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeeliberto, Mac OS X doesn&#8217;t follow the W3C widget standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mRkukov</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68871</link>
		<dc:creator>mRkukov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68871</guid>
		<description>&quot;-tag&quot;
should be &quot;&quot; -tag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;-tag&#8221;<br />
should be &#8220;&#8221; -tag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mRkukov</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68870</link>
		<dc:creator>mRkukov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68870</guid>
		<description>This would be nice!

It&#039;s nice to hear how Opera share the W3C standard development with everyone. I hope the  -tag will also accepted as standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be nice!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to hear how Opera share the W3C standard development with everyone. I hope the  -tag will also accepted as standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeeliberto</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html/comment-page-1#comment-68869</link>
		<dc:creator>yeeliberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/opera-widgets-in-joost.html#comment-68869</guid>
		<description>That is really cool.  Does widget applies to the ones for Mac OS X?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really cool.  Does widget applies to the ones for Mac OS X?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
