<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajaxian: Browsers other than Opera are falling victim to the successes of Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69313</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69313</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the best browser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the best browser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69312</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69312</guid>
		<description>Yeah. True!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. True!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_sk</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69195</link>
		<dc:creator>j_sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69195</guid>
		<description>2nd @w2
computer world, the open one almost, doesn&#039;t obey the simple consumption law.
It&#039;s not that simple as use it and forget. A very vey small amount of basic bases are required.
a big thanks to all devs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd @w2<br />
computer world, the open one almost, doesn&#8217;t obey the simple consumption law.<br />
It&#8217;s not that simple as use it and forget. A very vey small amount of basic bases are required.<br />
a big thanks to all devs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_sk</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69194</link>
		<dc:creator>j_sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69194</guid>
		<description>@w2
Once you&#039;ve set your files, and it&#039;s very easy, nothing impeeds to set your cache in your profiles folder on the stick. Your hard drive keeps clean of any temp or other files this way.
You can even also manage to have your cache on a Ram device, other than the stick.
In general, portable apps are made for a large public and almost not for slowing or complicating things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@w2<br />
Once you&#8217;ve set your files, and it&#8217;s very easy, nothing impeeds to set your cache in your profiles folder on the stick. Your hard drive keeps clean of any temp or other files this way.<br />
You can even also manage to have your cache on a Ram device, other than the stick.<br />
In general, portable apps are made for a large public and almost not for slowing or complicating things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69183</link>
		<dc:creator>w2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69183</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’d also like to say Markus Obermaier does a great job for Opera to be on a usbstick.&quot;

i&#039;ve tried few portable operas. user experience of them falls short to portable ff (http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable) all opera portable editions are too geeky to be viable for wider audience. you have to set this, that, and something else.. and it still uses your hard drive (or it used to, but i think it still does, yep it does &quot;To safe livetime of the USB Device and to increase speed of Opera, the cache-directory is on the harddisk (at Windows temp)&quot;) this is beause opera doesnt respect &#039;memory cache only&#039; and uses HDD anyways

simple unzip-and-go experience isnt there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d also like to say Markus Obermaier does a great job for Opera to be on a usbstick.&#8221;</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve tried few portable operas. user experience of them falls short to portable ff (<a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable">http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable</a>) all opera portable editions are too geeky to be viable for wider audience. you have to set this, that, and something else.. and it still uses your hard drive (or it used to, but i think it still does, yep it does &#8220;To safe livetime of the USB Device and to increase speed of Opera, the cache-directory is on the harddisk (at Windows temp)&#8221;) this is beause opera doesnt respect &#8216;memory cache only&#8217; and uses HDD anyways</p>
<p>simple unzip-and-go experience isnt there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tqm_z</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69162</link>
		<dc:creator>tqm_z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69162</guid>
		<description>Try point your opera to sourceforge.net, download something, and try to swicth mirror... 
it turn out opera can handle simple mirror switch.

Some ajax image preview also may choke an Opera...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try point your opera to sourceforge.net, download something, and try to swicth mirror&#8230;<br />
it turn out opera can handle simple mirror switch.</p>
<p>Some ajax image preview also may choke an Opera&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LXj</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69152</link>
		<dc:creator>LXj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69152</guid>
		<description>Try using Google Reader with something like Athlon 1000, and you will notice that Opera is the slowest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try using Google Reader with something like Athlon 1000, and you will notice that Opera is the slowest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_sk</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69147</link>
		<dc:creator>j_sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69147</guid>
		<description>@w*/whatever: criticism is constructive when the one who expresses it is not so easily angered. Objective criticism can&#039;t even stand any underlying self-anger ,I&#039;d say, for this latter expresses itself before all, hiding the rest. May it be in the form of a written speech.

I&#039;m sure Opera work depends on so much configs subjects. Where it works for one, it won&#039;t for other one. But that&#039;s not an Opera problem.
On a xp desktop I encounter (sometimes) unexpected behaviours, like frost screen, not responding, restarting. In cause: google screens sometimes.

But on this Vista notebook, I didn&#039;t see the shadow of problem since I switched to alpha version, now beta with weekly builds.
Yahoo mail beta works fine. Netvibes too. No Google issue. 
Well, with its highly customizable pretty look,  with its amazing speed, with its reliability too, Opera 9.50b just fits all my needs.
I&#039;d also like to say Markus Obermaier does a great job for Opera to be on a usbstick.
Take a look at its last zip package of 9.5beta version if you can, worthy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@w*/whatever: criticism is constructive when the one who expresses it is not so easily angered. Objective criticism can&#8217;t even stand any underlying self-anger ,I&#8217;d say, for this latter expresses itself before all, hiding the rest. May it be in the form of a written speech.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Opera work depends on so much configs subjects. Where it works for one, it won&#8217;t for other one. But that&#8217;s not an Opera problem.<br />
On a xp desktop I encounter (sometimes) unexpected behaviours, like frost screen, not responding, restarting. In cause: google screens sometimes.</p>
<p>But on this Vista notebook, I didn&#8217;t see the shadow of problem since I switched to alpha version, now beta with weekly builds.<br />
Yahoo mail beta works fine. Netvibes too. No Google issue.<br />
Well, with its highly customizable pretty look,  with its amazing speed, with its reliability too, Opera 9.50b just fits all my needs.<br />
I&#8217;d also like to say Markus Obermaier does a great job for Opera to be on a usbstick.<br />
Take a look at its last zip package of 9.5beta version if you can, worthy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Øyvind Ø</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69109</link>
		<dc:creator>Øyvind Ø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69109</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t really say it is working that fast, but at least it isn&#039;t faster in Firefox on my machine. I did change that one setting for you though. See if it is just as slow on your machine now as it was earlier.


PS: Also first time you log in there will of course be quite a bit of new feeds for you. This takes quite a bit of resources. Next time you log in the hit on your browser/cpu is not even close to what you feel the first time around.

- ØØ -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really say it is working that fast, but at least it isn&#8217;t faster in Firefox on my machine. I did change that one setting for you though. See if it is just as slow on your machine now as it was earlier.</p>
<p>PS: Also first time you log in there will of course be quite a bit of new feeds for you. This takes quite a bit of resources. Next time you log in the hit on your browser/cpu is not even close to what you feel the first time around.</p>
<p>- ØØ -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lomi</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69098</link>
		<dc:creator>Lomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69098</guid>
		<description>Hi Deniel, I say thank you for the answer. 
I deleted it the cache, you said it, but the Opera does not like it in this manner it I Netvibes my setting. 
The Opera reacts rather slowly sometimes. (scrolling page, klick tabs, many unread post loading, and automat refresh rss)
There is not problem with the opera. 
only Not liking the filling processes at me is the opera.

Send the mirroring Netvibes from my side. 
You can watch him going on your Opera and test. 

Sorry for my bad English knowledge :)

My Netvibes Test:

login: lomax@index.hu
password: TestElek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Deniel, I say thank you for the answer.<br />
I deleted it the cache, you said it, but the Opera does not like it in this manner it I Netvibes my setting.<br />
The Opera reacts rather slowly sometimes. (scrolling page, klick tabs, many unread post loading, and automat refresh rss)<br />
There is not problem with the opera.<br />
only Not liking the filling processes at me is the opera.</p>
<p>Send the mirroring Netvibes from my side.<br />
You can watch him going on your Opera and test. </p>
<p>Sorry for my bad English knowledge <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My Netvibes Test:</p>
<p>login: <a href="mailto:lomax@index.hu">lomax@index.hu</a><br />
password: TestElek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Øyvind Ø</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69090</link>
		<dc:creator>Øyvind Ø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69090</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using Netvibes with no problems too. It works better in Opera than in Firefox for me. If you have that many feeds try to divide them into different tabs, and check the setting &quot;Only load modules for current tab&quot; under the &quot;settings-&gt;general settings&quot;. That helps a lot on my slow computer.


- ØØ -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Netvibes with no problems too. It works better in Opera than in Firefox for me. If you have that many feeds try to divide them into different tabs, and check the setting &#8220;Only load modules for current tab&#8221; under the &#8220;settings-&gt;general settings&#8221;. That helps a lot on my slow computer.</p>
<p>- ØØ -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69087</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69087</guid>
		<description>Lomi, Netvibes runs fine on my Opera 9.24. Perhaps try deleting the cache (Tools &gt; Delete private data...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lomi, Netvibes runs fine on my Opera 9.24. Perhaps try deleting the cache (Tools > Delete private data&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lomi</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69084</link>
		<dc:creator>Lomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69084</guid>
		<description>My opera dies under Netvibes, 100% CPU load. 
I have 24 tabs and 100 rss. 
With this compilation unfortunately the opera lies the stomach, and will be unusable :( 
FF runs away cheerful :S
I hope for it something will be a solution, that let me be allowed to use an Opera for Netvibes browsing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opera dies under Netvibes, 100% CPU load.<br />
I have 24 tabs and 100 rss.<br />
With this compilation unfortunately the opera lies the stomach, and will be unusable <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
FF runs away cheerful :S<br />
I hope for it something will be a solution, that let me be allowed to use an Opera for Netvibes browsing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69083</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69083</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure banning is the right thing to do here, as this is an open forum. I do, however, hope that that w* will seriously reconsider his trolling activities -- they certainly aren&#039;t constructive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure banning is the right thing to do here, as this is an open forum. I do, however, hope that that w* will seriously reconsider his trolling activities &#8212; they certainly aren&#8217;t constructive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeni Setiawan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html/comment-page-1#comment-69078</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeni Setiawan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/11/ajaxian-browsers-other-than-opera-are-falling-victim-to-the-successes-of-ajax.html#comment-69078</guid>
		<description>I love Opera for its power to handle as many tabs as I wanted. I visited my favorite image gallery every two week and found many images to view. Using Opera, I just need to open each thumbnail into bigger view on a new tab. It might be 50 tabs or more.

Amazingly, there&#039;s no memory leakage and my notebook (and Opera itself) still running well, without loosing its processor speed!

About Yahoo! Mail beta, I don&#039;t use it. I prefer old style Yahoo! Mail :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Opera for its power to handle as many tabs as I wanted. I visited my favorite image gallery every two week and found many images to view. Using Opera, I just need to open each thumbnail into bigger view on a new tab. It might be 50 tabs or more.</p>
<p>Amazingly, there&#8217;s no memory leakage and my notebook (and Opera itself) still running well, without loosing its processor speed!</p>
<p>About Yahoo! Mail beta, I don&#8217;t use it. I prefer old style Yahoo! Mail :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
