<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera&#8217;s UI and customization interview: Submit your questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zajec</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67619</link>
		<dc:creator>Zajec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67619</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;3. When we will see updater version of Info panel: http://my.opera.com/nafmo/blog/2006/11/30/updating-the-info-panel ?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Oh, that is already in 9.50 Alpha 3! Great! Sorry, my mistake ─ question canceled :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>3. When we will see updater version of Info panel: <a href="http://my.opera.com/nafmo/blog/2006/11/30/updating-the-info-panel">http://my.opera.com/nafmo/blog/2006/11/30/updating-the-info-panel</a> ?</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, that is already in 9.50 Alpha 3! Great! Sorry, my mistake ─ question canceled <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luchio</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67610</link>
		<dc:creator>Luchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67610</guid>
		<description>I would love to be able to right-click on bookmarks to edit their properties or right-click on feeds individually to have options to update the feeds.  The panels are nice but very inconvenient to use on 4:3 screens.  Any plans to have a more powerful menu system in future releases, on all platforms?  Are there technical problems with such an implementation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to be able to right-click on bookmarks to edit their properties or right-click on feeds individually to have options to update the feeds.  The panels are nice but very inconvenient to use on 4:3 screens.  Any plans to have a more powerful menu system in future releases, on all platforms?  Are there technical problems with such an implementation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67604</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67604</guid>
		<description>what is the reason why &#039;star in the address bar&#039; (and similar options that were removed instead of being turned off) was REMOVED instead of being off by default. why hardcoding took precedence in front of providing a config option? why that hardcoding approach is the sign of latest opera development?

is the new opera skin in works?

is the new opera logo in works?

if you don&#039;t want to disclose - is the change/alteration of identity even considered?

what was the test group that recent UI changes were tested on? 100 people? 10k people? or, i fear that, 3 people that were accidentally wandering trough the nearest corridor?

why back/forward buttons with arrows arent the default ones instead of ones without arrows? [i know that operas one displays menu after holding mouseclick for a while, but NOONE WILL NEVER KNOW THAT!]. you start a war for consistency from the wrong end

and using wrong methods:
are you planning to include keyboard layouts instead of hardcoding pieces of configuration into the opera code?

will middle mouse click be EVER customizable? what is so different in this button

whats wrong in providing &#039;close tab and switch to the tab to the right&#039; as an option? this is the prime consistency problem, not the status bar, that i personally feel a clutter

when opera is going to understand &#039;middle mouse click on javascript link&#039;?

when opera will provide always on top option for error console?

why detaching tab options are hidden so well, and why there is no easy way of attatching a tab to a window. way that works is so hard to find, that i dont think that anyone could have guessed how it works on their own.

etc etc etc but i simply feel that most answers are going to be &#039;we are working on it&#039; :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the reason why &#8217;star in the address bar&#8217; (and similar options that were removed instead of being turned off) was REMOVED instead of being off by default. why hardcoding took precedence in front of providing a config option? why that hardcoding approach is the sign of latest opera development?</p>
<p>is the new opera skin in works?</p>
<p>is the new opera logo in works?</p>
<p>if you don&#8217;t want to disclose &#8211; is the change/alteration of identity even considered?</p>
<p>what was the test group that recent UI changes were tested on? 100 people? 10k people? or, i fear that, 3 people that were accidentally wandering trough the nearest corridor?</p>
<p>why back/forward buttons with arrows arent the default ones instead of ones without arrows? [i know that operas one displays menu after holding mouseclick for a while, but NOONE WILL NEVER KNOW THAT!]. you start a war for consistency from the wrong end</p>
<p>and using wrong methods:<br />
are you planning to include keyboard layouts instead of hardcoding pieces of configuration into the opera code?</p>
<p>will middle mouse click be EVER customizable? what is so different in this button</p>
<p>whats wrong in providing &#8216;close tab and switch to the tab to the right&#8217; as an option? this is the prime consistency problem, not the status bar, that i personally feel a clutter</p>
<p>when opera is going to understand &#8216;middle mouse click on javascript link&#8217;?</p>
<p>when opera will provide always on top option for error console?</p>
<p>why detaching tab options are hidden so well, and why there is no easy way of attatching a tab to a window. way that works is so hard to find, that i dont think that anyone could have guessed how it works on their own.</p>
<p>etc etc etc but i simply feel that most answers are going to be &#8216;we are working on it&#8217; :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please enhance the search.ini</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67588</link>
		<dc:creator>Please enhance the search.ini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67588</guid>
		<description>I would love to have the ability to change the order of the search machines used by search.ini.
Perhaps with up &amp; down arrows, or the possibility to sort them alphabetically.
Thanx, Marcus

taken from:
http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=200865&amp;t=1189542985&amp;page=1#comment2240737</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to have the ability to change the order of the search machines used by search.ini.<br />
Perhaps with up &amp; down arrows, or the possibility to sort them alphabetically.<br />
Thanx, Marcus</p>
<p>taken from:<br />
<a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=200865&amp;t=1189542985&amp;page=1#comment2240737">http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=200865&amp;t=1189542985&amp;page=1#comment2240737</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67574</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Vincent: in Firefox I had to click on address bar to paste text ─ and this is fine IMO. For Opera it doesn’t matter where I click. That’s what I don’t like.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are comparing apples and oranges here ;-) , middleclick on an open window/page pastes the selection buffer in almost all Unix apps, it doesn&#039;t matter where you click on. For example, if you middleclick on the edge of a terminal window, the content will be pasted wherever the cursor is placed, same happens with other apps like text editors, etc. Opera does the same thing but since it&#039;s a browser it opens a new page, pastes the buffer and then goes to it. If you want to paste the content directly into the address field, Opera won&#039;t go to the page until you press enter -- just like in FF.  Just because FF doesn&#039;t implement middleclick on page  doesn&#039;t mean Opera is doing something wrong. Besides, you can always disable the middleclick thingy under preferences (by using the panning option). 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Vincent: in Firefox I had to click on address bar to paste text ─ and this is fine IMO. For Opera it doesn’t matter where I click. That’s what I don’t like.</p></blockquote>
<p>You are comparing apples and oranges here <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  , middleclick on an open window/page pastes the selection buffer in almost all Unix apps, it doesn&#8217;t matter where you click on. For example, if you middleclick on the edge of a terminal window, the content will be pasted wherever the cursor is placed, same happens with other apps like text editors, etc. Opera does the same thing but since it&#8217;s a browser it opens a new page, pastes the buffer and then goes to it. If you want to paste the content directly into the address field, Opera won&#8217;t go to the page until you press enter &#8212; just like in FF.  Just because FF doesn&#8217;t implement middleclick on page  doesn&#8217;t mean Opera is doing something wrong. Besides, you can always disable the middleclick thingy under preferences (by using the panning option). </p>
<p> <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maulkin</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67571</link>
		<dc:creator>Maulkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67571</guid>
		<description>&quot;Either select a &quot;simple or &quot;advanced&quot; GUi&quot;

I agree on that point!

The question now:

why is that it&#039;s not possible to add as many toolbars (let&#039;s say, I want seven of them because I have a 30&quot; screen and a loooot of place to use) as we want where we want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Either select a &#8220;simple or &#8220;advanced&#8221; GUi&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree on that point!</p>
<p>The question now:</p>
<p>why is that it&#8217;s not possible to add as many toolbars (let&#8217;s say, I want seven of them because I have a 30&#8243; screen and a loooot of place to use) as we want where we want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jochen</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67567</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67567</guid>
		<description>This one relates to the proxy configuration dialogue. Two things struck me here: One is that it&#039;s not clear which of the many options (proxy settings, exclude list, automatic configuraion) takes precedence. If I&#039;ve got the automatic proxy configuration filled, it&#039;s preferred over my other proxy settings - but that&#039;s not clear. The other issue involves quick toggling of the proxy settings via F12 - I&#039;d expect that when I uncheck the proxy server option, Opera disables ALL proxy settings (which it does), but when I check it again, it reenables only the ones that were previously enabled (which it doesn&#039;t, it enables all that have values filled in). Any chance of getting this resolved with Opera 9.5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one relates to the proxy configuration dialogue. Two things struck me here: One is that it&#8217;s not clear which of the many options (proxy settings, exclude list, automatic configuraion) takes precedence. If I&#8217;ve got the automatic proxy configuration filled, it&#8217;s preferred over my other proxy settings &#8211; but that&#8217;s not clear. The other issue involves quick toggling of the proxy settings via F12 &#8211; I&#8217;d expect that when I uncheck the proxy server option, Opera disables ALL proxy settings (which it does), but when I check it again, it reenables only the ones that were previously enabled (which it doesn&#8217;t, it enables all that have values filled in). Any chance of getting this resolved with Opera 9.5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cousin333</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67566</link>
		<dc:creator>cousin333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67566</guid>
		<description>WildEnte: A agree with you except a few thing...

&quot;I find it incredibly unintuitive that clicking the X in a panel closes the whole panel bar and not only that particular panel.&quot;

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s unintuitive. I think, that&#039;s the way it should work.

But I agree missing &#039;&gt;&gt;&#039; which was pretty useful, and agree removing Fast forward and rewind from default layout. Tha latter ones can be really confusing for new users (&quot;Why &#039;two&#039; back and forward buttons?&quot;).

Also missing View bar, why you&#039;d have to remove it COMPLETELY? What&#039;s more, you shouldn&#039;t have to adapt to new users by turning keyboard shortcuts upside down, and similar to the other browsers. With each improvement on FF side, Opera loses his uniquenesses one by one. And you assist for it. Create a &#039;starter&#039; Opera interface (and buttons), and leave us the option to swich back to &#039;advanced&#039; mode. Than everyone will be happy. Opera has the possibility for that so you should use it.

oops: Otto has beat me in this suggestion... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WildEnte: A agree with you except a few thing&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I find it incredibly unintuitive that clicking the X in a panel closes the whole panel bar and not only that particular panel.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s unintuitive. I think, that&#8217;s the way it should work.</p>
<p>But I agree missing &#8216;&gt;&gt;&#8217; which was pretty useful, and agree removing Fast forward and rewind from default layout. Tha latter ones can be really confusing for new users (&#8221;Why &#8216;two&#8217; back and forward buttons?&#8221;).</p>
<p>Also missing View bar, why you&#8217;d have to remove it COMPLETELY? What&#8217;s more, you shouldn&#8217;t have to adapt to new users by turning keyboard shortcuts upside down, and similar to the other browsers. With each improvement on FF side, Opera loses his uniquenesses one by one. And you assist for it. Create a &#8217;starter&#8217; Opera interface (and buttons), and leave us the option to swich back to &#8216;advanced&#8217; mode. Than everyone will be happy. Opera has the possibility for that so you should use it.</p>
<p>oops: Otto has beat me in this suggestion&#8230; <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zajec</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67562</link>
		<dc:creator>Zajec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67562</guid>
		<description>Vincent: in Firefox I had to click on address bar to paste text ─ and this is fine IMO. For Opera it doesn&#039;t matter where I click. That&#039;s what I don&#039;t like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent: in Firefox I had to click on address bar to paste text ─ and this is fine IMO. For Opera it doesn&#8217;t matter where I click. That&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67559</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67559</guid>
		<description>Q: Is anyone to blame for the new CTRL+ALT+SHIFT+H?. Name of the Opera employee responsible for it is needed. :p

&lt;blockquote&gt;1. Why default action in Opera (on Linux) for middle mouse click is “Paste text from clipboard”? This is quite confusing, doesn’t exist in Firefox and in Konqueror there is a special alert. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

First, it doesn&#039;t paste text from clipboard, it pastes the selection buffer which  is a different beast. Second, how come is it confusing?. Middleclick pasting is standard in Unix applications -- if I middleclick in the terminal, it pastes the buffer content, same happens in Opera: a new page opens with the content of the selection buffer as an address; that&#039;s the expected result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: Is anyone to blame for the new CTRL+ALT+SHIFT+H?. Name of the Opera employee responsible for it is needed. :p</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Why default action in Opera (on Linux) for middle mouse click is “Paste text from clipboard”? This is quite confusing, doesn’t exist in Firefox and in Konqueror there is a special alert. </p></blockquote>
<p>First, it doesn&#8217;t paste text from clipboard, it pastes the selection buffer which  is a different beast. Second, how come is it confusing?. Middleclick pasting is standard in Unix applications &#8212; if I middleclick in the terminal, it pastes the buffer content, same happens in Opera: a new page opens with the content of the selection buffer as an address; that&#8217;s the expected result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67557</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67557</guid>
		<description>How about adding an option to select either &#039;simple&#039; or &#039;advanced&#039; GUI, where Opera defaults to &#039;simple&#039; mode? I think the simple option is a great selling point for users converting from their familiar IE and FF, or find too many options confusing. Power users know the ins and outs of Opera and will know where to switch this on. Besides, upgrades should automatically select the current GUI mode to avoid burning any extra calories locating the tick box :)

I&#039;d like to see the rewind and fast forward buttons go (disabled), the magic wand button and perhaps a home button added by default. It&#039;s very rare that I actually use them and would be happy to sacrifice them to gain less clutter. Off course I could press F11, but I do like to see the tabs and the addressbar.

My two pennies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about adding an option to select either &#8217;simple&#8217; or &#8216;advanced&#8217; GUI, where Opera defaults to &#8217;simple&#8217; mode? I think the simple option is a great selling point for users converting from their familiar IE and FF, or find too many options confusing. Power users know the ins and outs of Opera and will know where to switch this on. Besides, upgrades should automatically select the current GUI mode to avoid burning any extra calories locating the tick box <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see the rewind and fast forward buttons go (disabled), the magic wand button and perhaps a home button added by default. It&#8217;s very rare that I actually use them and would be happy to sacrifice them to gain less clutter. Off course I could press F11, but I do like to see the tabs and the addressbar.</p>
<p>My two pennies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie (W)</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67555</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie (W)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67555</guid>
		<description>nitpick: Is the *best* UI for customizing mouse gestures &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; typing &quot;GestureLeft, GestureRight, GestureLeft&quot;  -Can&#039;t we do: &quot;L,R,L&quot; or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nitpick: Is the *best* UI for customizing mouse gestures <i>really</i> typing &#8220;GestureLeft, GestureRight, GestureLeft&#8221;  -Can&#8217;t we do: &#8220;L,R,L&#8221; or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WildEnte</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67552</link>
		<dc:creator>WildEnte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67552</guid>
		<description>IceAdor,

I&#039;m not talking about a different version. I am talking about a second keyboard setup, selectable in prefs-advanced-shortcuts or at least downloadable in a prominent place on my.opera.com

Concerning the view bar: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=203759&amp;t=1189509980&amp;page=2#comment2236098</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IceAdor,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not talking about a different version. I am talking about a second keyboard setup, selectable in prefs-advanced-shortcuts or at least downloadable in a prominent place on my.opera.com</p>
<p>Concerning the view bar: <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=203759&amp;t=1189509980&amp;page=2#comment2236098">http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=203759&amp;t=1189509980&amp;page=2#comment2236098</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67550</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67550</guid>
		<description>Hello Rijk,

When there is a blog post about Opera somewhere, you can always read things such as &quot;I tried Opera, but is there an AdBlock/NoScript/GM/DownThemAll/whatever equivalent? I can&#039;t live without that.&quot;

Let&#039;s face it - there is a lot of hidden and practically invisible, but EXTREMELY useful functionality in Opera. Do you plan on addressing that, and if so, how?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rijk,</p>
<p>When there is a blog post about Opera somewhere, you can always read things such as &#8220;I tried Opera, but is there an AdBlock/NoScript/GM/DownThemAll/whatever equivalent? I can&#8217;t live without that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it &#8211; there is a lot of hidden and practically invisible, but EXTREMELY useful functionality in Opera. Do you plan on addressing that, and if so, how?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serious</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-67548</link>
		<dc:creator>serious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/09/operas-ui-and-customization-interview-submit-your-questions.html#comment-67548</guid>
		<description>1) Why has &quot;Save Target as ...&quot; been renamed to &quot;Save Link as ...&quot;? The new name is wrong and confusing (saving a link affects a pointer to the file, saving a target affects the file itself)
2) Default shotcuts: are really bad/confusing atm (like ctrl+n for a new window instead of new page. ctrl+shift+n should open a new window and ctrl+n should stay the way it was or some other things ... will have to upload my settings sometimes soon) Luckily you can customize the shortcuts ;)
3) as Zajec posted: Simple way to install UserJS? please, please, please!
4) uhm ... ah: Preferences Dialogue: Really confusing atm - esp. as nearly every feature you want to change is in the advanced tab in some subcategory. Will this be better sorted in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Why has &#8220;Save Target as &#8230;&#8221; been renamed to &#8220;Save Link as &#8230;&#8221;? The new name is wrong and confusing (saving a link affects a pointer to the file, saving a target affects the file itself)<br />
2) Default shotcuts: are really bad/confusing atm (like ctrl+n for a new window instead of new page. ctrl+shift+n should open a new window and ctrl+n should stay the way it was or some other things &#8230; will have to upload my settings sometimes soon) Luckily you can customize the shortcuts <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
3) as Zajec posted: Simple way to install UserJS? please, please, please!<br />
4) uhm &#8230; ah: Preferences Dialogue: Really confusing atm &#8211; esp. as nearly every feature you want to change is in the advanced tab in some subcategory. Will this be better sorted in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
