<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera and CSS3 support compared to the other browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67056</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67056</guid>
		<description>On the one side Opera works on CSS3 - and on the other side: look at the web, designers should work with CSS. But there are hundreds of thousands of sites doing layout with tables :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one side Opera works on CSS3 - and on the other side: look at the web, designers should work with CSS. But there are hundreds of thousands of sites doing layout with tables <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67017</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67017</guid>
		<description>Junyor, i stand corrected, and indeed VERY happy. that bug IS a killer. thanks for clarification</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Junyor, i stand corrected, and indeed VERY happy. that bug IS a killer. thanks for clarification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Altman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67016</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Altman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67016</guid>
		<description>@sid: Howdy.  I'm Junyor on the MyOpera forums.  As Joachim already pointed out, that post was made prior to our plan to release Kestrel before Peregrine.  In any case, the bug will be fixed in Kestrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sid: Howdy.  I&#8217;m Junyor on the MyOpera forums.  As Joachim already pointed out, that post was made prior to our plan to release Kestrel before Peregrine.  In any case, the bug will be fixed in Kestrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ...</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67013</link>
		<dc:creator>...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67013</guid>
		<description>Ping:

Why didn’t sid give us, say, five examples where Opera is “always going upstream”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ping:</p>
<p>Why didn’t sid give us, say, five examples where Opera is “always going upstream”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joachimb</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67010</link>
		<dc:creator>joachimb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-67010</guid>
		<description>@Beeblebrox: Yup, almost. This is an exception. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beeblebrox: Yup, almost. This is an exception. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ...</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66998</link>
		<dc:creator>...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66998</guid>
		<description>Why didn't sid give us, say, five examples where Opera is "always going upstream"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t sid give us, say, five examples where Opera is &#8220;always going upstream&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beeblebrox</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66986</link>
		<dc:creator>Beeblebrox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66986</guid>
		<description>@joachimb Unfortunately, a "major release" almost always means an increase in the first digit of the version number, which in this case means a switch from 9 to 10 AKA Peregrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@joachimb Unfortunately, a &#8220;major release&#8221; almost always means an increase in the first digit of the version number, which in this case means a switch from 9 to 10 AKA Peregrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joachimb</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66970</link>
		<dc:creator>joachimb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66970</guid>
		<description>@sid: Tim probably said that before Opera had planned Kestrel at all. Ignore "Peregrine" in that statement, what matters is "next major release".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sid: Tim probably said that before Opera had planned Kestrel at all. Ignore &#8220;Peregrine&#8221; in that statement, what matters is &#8220;next major release&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuplad@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66966</link>
		<dc:creator>tuplad@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66966</guid>
		<description>And what is it all useful for ? :]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what is it all useful for ? :]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66965</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66965</guid>
		<description>@Berend: Yes I did read what I linked to! As others have said, peregrine is not going to be here any time soon. My point is simply that the average user I believe (imho) is going to be more interested in a bug fix like this being fast tracked than CSS3 support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Berend: Yes I did read what I linked to! As others have said, peregrine is not going to be here any time soon. My point is simply that the average user I believe (imho) is going to be more interested in a bug fix like this being fast tracked than CSS3 support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myself</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66963</link>
		<dc:creator>myself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66963</guid>
		<description>Yep, given the current schedule for kestrel (remember back in june when they said it was a few weeks away?)   PEREGRINE == DUKE NUKEM FOREVER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, given the current schedule for kestrel (remember back in june when they said it was a few weeks away?)   PEREGRINE == DUKE NUKEM FOREVER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66961</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66961</guid>
		<description>"It's unlikely to be fixed until Peregrine (the next major release)." said Junyor, Opera employee

peregine is going to take several months to arrive, most probably more than a year or two analysing current opera development schedules.

so for a year or longer it is better to use something else than opera for gmail/vox. considering, that default wordpress theme is bugged in opera (top links not clickable in certain conditions) using opera for wordpress is tricky anyways.  go here - http://www.favbrowser.com/why-firefox-is-blocked/#comments and see how the breadcrumb behaves after scrolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s unlikely to be fixed until Peregrine (the next major release).&#8221; said Junyor, Opera employee</p>
<p>peregine is going to take several months to arrive, most probably more than a year or two analysing current opera development schedules.</p>
<p>so for a year or longer it is better to use something else than opera for gmail/vox. considering, that default wordpress theme is bugged in opera (top links not clickable in certain conditions) using opera for wordpress is tricky anyways.  go here - <a href="http://www.favbrowser.com/why-firefox-is-blocked/#comments">http://www.favbrowser.com/why-firefox-is-blocked/#comments</a> and see how the breadcrumb behaves after scrolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berend</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66960</link>
		<dc:creator>Berend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66960</guid>
		<description>@Duncan: I just have red the "text wrap" and if I read it good they are already working on that problem. and probably will be fixed in the next big thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Duncan: I just have red the &#8220;text wrap&#8221; and if I read it good they are already working on that problem. and probably will be fixed in the next big thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66957</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66957</guid>
		<description>Aside from CSS3 it would be nice if the &lt;a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=167246" rel="nofollow"&gt;text wrap problem&lt;/a&gt; evident most notably in Gmail and Wordpress post/email composition was fixed as a priority. This has been around for a while and is I would have thought for most users a far bigger issue than CSS3 support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from CSS3 it would be nice if the <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=167246">text wrap problem</a> evident most notably in Gmail and Wordpress post/email composition was fixed as a priority. This has been around for a while and is I would have thought for most users a far bigger issue than CSS3 support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hog</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66954</link>
		<dc:creator>hog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/08/opera-and-css3-support-compared-to-the-other-browsers.html#comment-66954</guid>
		<description>preview build or it didn't happen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>preview build or it didn&#8217;t happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
