<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera 9 shown to be fastest browser in yet anther speed test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Robinski</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-66407</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Robinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-66407</guid>
		<description>Opera is the fastest browser on Windows, but Safari for Mac is faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is the fastest browser on Windows, but Safari for Mac is faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LXj</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-66400</link>
		<dc:creator>LXj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-66400</guid>
		<description>Oh, if they tested Opera in Google Reader, it wouldn&#039;t be as fast...

I hope rewrite of JS engine in 9.5 will solve this problem. I use FF only because when Google Reader feeds with lots of articles make Opera consumu 100% CPU (I came to this page from Google Reader, so you see my browser is FF currently)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, if they tested Opera in Google Reader, it wouldn&#8217;t be as fast&#8230;</p>
<p>I hope rewrite of JS engine in 9.5 will solve this problem. I use FF only because when Google Reader feeds with lots of articles make Opera consumu 100% CPU (I came to this page from Google Reader, so you see my browser is FF currently)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bishop</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65955</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65955</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been deeply skeptical of these sorts of tests, particularly for marketing purposes (because you just choose to test the functionality that your chosen browser is good at and your competitors aren&#039;t) but here&#039;s what I got (Windows XP SP2):

Safari 3.0.2 Beta - 1472ms
Opera 9.21 - 1633ms
Minefield 2007071705 - 5205ms
Firefox 2.0.0.4 - 6399ms
Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 - 9974ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been deeply skeptical of these sorts of tests, particularly for marketing purposes (because you just choose to test the functionality that your chosen browser is good at and your competitors aren&#8217;t) but here&#8217;s what I got (Windows XP SP2):</p>
<p>Safari 3.0.2 Beta &#8211; 1472ms<br />
Opera 9.21 &#8211; 1633ms<br />
Minefield 2007071705 &#8211; 5205ms<br />
Firefox 2.0.0.4 &#8211; 6399ms<br />
Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 &#8211; 9974ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65934</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65934</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve run these tests on my computer yesterday, got mostly the same results as those posted on the blog I linked to. There are apparently other factors involved in this test. We obviously all didn&#039;t test on the same Opera installation -- we all have modified it a bit, which may contribute to speed changes. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run these tests on my computer yesterday, got mostly the same results as those posted on the blog I linked to. There are apparently other factors involved in this test. We obviously all didn&#8217;t test on the same Opera installation &#8212; we all have modified it a bit, which may contribute to speed changes. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65929</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65929</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have benchmarks to go by but 9.22 is super fast at rendering pages for me. On my machine, Safari beta for Windows did seem faster than 9.21, but I&#039;m not so sure that it&#039;s faster than 9.22. And, of course, there&#039;s no real comparison between the two in terms of function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have benchmarks to go by but 9.22 is super fast at rendering pages for me. On my machine, Safari beta for Windows did seem faster than 9.21, but I&#8217;m not so sure that it&#8217;s faster than 9.22. And, of course, there&#8217;s no real comparison between the two in terms of function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aizatsky</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65927</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aizatsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65927</guid>
		<description>Just a note: this numbers are for selector speed test: http://extjs.com/playpen/slickspeed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note: this numbers are for selector speed test: <a href="http://extjs.com/playpen/slickspeed/">http://extjs.com/playpen/slickspeed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aizatsky</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65926</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aizatsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65926</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got quite different results on 4-core Mac Pro:

Safari:  115 	 161 	 118 	 87 	 171
Firefox:  146 	 355 	 152 	 256 	 306 
Opera:  137 	 215 	 138 	 138 	 146 

every test except the last one shows that Safari is faster... I was always looking at Opera claims as being the fastest browser as a cheap marketing hype. It was never as fast as Safari is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got quite different results on 4-core Mac Pro:</p>
<p>Safari:  115 	 161 	 118 	 87 	 171<br />
Firefox:  146 	 355 	 152 	 256 	 306<br />
Opera:  137 	 215 	 138 	 138 	 146 </p>
<p>every test except the last one shows that Safari is faster&#8230; I was always looking at Opera claims as being the fastest browser as a cheap marketing hype. It was never as fast as Safari is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ResearchWizard</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65918</link>
		<dc:creator>ResearchWizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65918</guid>
		<description>Opera is the slowest and the fastest Browser in my quick and totally unprofessional test on http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php

Opera9.21 (my productive installation with lots of tabs + email etc): 6649 ms
FF2.0.0.4 (tons of extensions, one tab): 4916 ms
IE7 (pretty unused and uncustomized, one tab): 4827ms
Safari 3.02beta Win (pretty unused, one tab): 1052 ms
Opera 9.22 freshly installed: 931 ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is the slowest and the fastest Browser in my quick and totally unprofessional test on <a href="http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php">http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php</a></p>
<p>Opera9.21 (my productive installation with lots of tabs + email etc): 6649 ms<br />
FF2.0.0.4 (tons of extensions, one tab): 4916 ms<br />
IE7 (pretty unused and uncustomized, one tab): 4827ms<br />
Safari 3.02beta Win (pretty unused, one tab): 1052 ms<br />
Opera 9.22 freshly installed: 931 ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remember</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65899</link>
		<dc:creator>Remember</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65899</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Actually, Safari 3.0.2 was twice as fast as Opera 9.22 every time&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you sure that this isn&#039;t another case of the Safari bug that led to misleading numbers in Apple&#039;s marketing material for Safari 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Actually, Safari 3.0.2 was twice as fast as Opera 9.22 every time</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you sure that this isn&#8217;t another case of the Safari bug that led to misleading numbers in Apple&#8217;s marketing material for Safari 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dArt</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65895</link>
		<dc:creator>dArt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65895</guid>
		<description>My results are aleays ~1000. Dunno why, maybe i use to many features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My results are aleays ~1000. Dunno why, maybe i use to many features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65893</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65893</guid>
		<description>safari had a problem with date = new Date() geting each time the SAME time. javascript based benchmarks provided exceptional results of some scripts executing in 0.0ms. date object is weird in safari, i believe only in stopwatched results. if you cant measure your sample because it takes 20ms to do it - multiply it by 100 and then use stopwatch

minefield is DAMN FAST, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>safari had a problem with date = new Date() geting each time the SAME time. javascript based benchmarks provided exceptional results of some scripts executing in 0.0ms. date object is weird in safari, i believe only in stopwatched results. if you cant measure your sample because it takes 20ms to do it &#8211; multiply it by 100 and then use stopwatch</p>
<p>minefield is DAMN FAST, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Magruder</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65891</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Magruder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65891</guid>
		<description>I use and love Opera.  However, when I want speed, I do run the Safari beta.  It DOES load and render pages faster.  I don&#039;t know what the stop watches say and I don&#039;t honestly care, because however they do it, the end result is that the pages load and render faster than Opera 9.2.

Safari is still basically cripleware featurewise and nowhere near as friendly to use as Opera, so Opera is in no danger of me leaving it, but I can&#039;t in good conscience accept benchmarks that deny what is in plain site.  Safari DOES load and layout typical pages faster than anything else I&#039;ve used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use and love Opera.  However, when I want speed, I do run the Safari beta.  It DOES load and render pages faster.  I don&#8217;t know what the stop watches say and I don&#8217;t honestly care, because however they do it, the end result is that the pages load and render faster than Opera 9.2.</p>
<p>Safari is still basically cripleware featurewise and nowhere near as friendly to use as Opera, so Opera is in no danger of me leaving it, but I can&#8217;t in good conscience accept benchmarks that deny what is in plain site.  Safari DOES load and layout typical pages faster than anything else I&#8217;ve used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65890</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65890</guid>
		<description>Browsing speed is nice, but what affects my day to day life is development speed. Until Opera gets a Firebug analogue it won&#039;t come close to speeding my life up in the way that Firefox does, and even then bettering the wealth of other extensions is going to take some doing.

For what it&#039;s worth, Firefox does run awfully on that set of tests. Anyone got a recent nightly of Minefield to test on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browsing speed is nice, but what affects my day to day life is development speed. Until Opera gets a Firebug analogue it won&#8217;t come close to speeding my life up in the way that Firefox does, and even then bettering the wealth of other extensions is going to take some doing.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Firefox does run awfully on that set of tests. Anyone got a recent nightly of Minefield to test on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Monroe</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65889</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65889</guid>
		<description>Actually, Safari 3.0.2 was twice as fast as Opera 9.22 every time with http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php - is everyone else getting the same type of result?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Safari 3.0.2 was twice as fast as Opera 9.22 every time with <a href="http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php">http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php</a> &#8211; is everyone else getting the same type of result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Monroe</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-65888</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/07/opera-9-shown-to-be-fastest-browser-in-yet-anther-speed-test.html#comment-65888</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear that! It pained me to hear Jobs say Safari 3 beat every other browser... To navigate through non-encrypted pages in history, Opera beats everyone hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear that! It pained me to hear Jobs say Safari 3 beat every other browser&#8230; To navigate through non-encrypted pages in history, Opera beats everyone hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
