<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Opera ranks with its SVG implementation? &#8220;Best native implementation&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56673</guid>
		<description>Frederik,

Batik has a standlone viewer (Squiggle) but can also be used as a Java applet in any browser.  I&#039;ve tried this on multiple browsers and it works (includes a JS interpreter too).  However, I haven&#039;t done any performance tests with Batik yet to see how it would fair against games or interactive SVG apps that need to be fast.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frederik,</p>
<p>Batik has a standlone viewer (Squiggle) but can also be used as a Java applet in any browser.  I&#8217;ve tried this on multiple browsers and it works (includes a JS interpreter too).  However, I haven&#8217;t done any performance tests with Batik yet to see how it would fair against games or interactive SVG apps that need to be fast.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederik</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56655</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56655</guid>
		<description>Hey, is there really a Batik browser plugin available? I only found that standalone SVG viewer.

Now that Batik supports animation, I&#039;d really be glad if it could add SVG support to browsers. Adobe stopped supporting ASV, so we really need an alternative for this - sadly not everybody&#039;s using Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, is there really a Batik browser plugin available? I only found that standalone SVG viewer.</p>
<p>Now that Batik supports animation, I&#8217;d really be glad if it could add SVG support to browsers. Adobe stopped supporting ASV, so we really need an alternative for this &#8211; sadly not everybody&#8217;s using Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cap</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56622</link>
		<dc:creator>cap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56622</guid>
		<description>minghong, what do you base that assumption on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>minghong, what do you base that assumption on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56598</guid>
		<description>Sorry, that should be &quot;scripting and DOM support&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that should be &#8220;scripting and DOM support&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56597</guid>
		<description>minghong, the test suite does include tests for scripting and support (though I think animation has a larger share).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>minghong, the test suite does include tests for scripting and support (though I think animation has a larger share).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minghong</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56594</link>
		<dc:creator>minghong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56594</guid>
		<description>What if the test suites include scripting/DOM support? This would slightly increase the percentage for Firefox and Adobe SVG viewer&#8230;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the test suites include scripting/DOM support? This would slightly increase the percentage for Firefox and Adobe SVG viewer&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56590</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56590</guid>
		<description>&gt; It seems embed type=”image/svg+xml” …&gt; don’t work

Hmm.. actually I&#039;m unable to pinpoint exactly which embed tags work and which don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; It seems embed type=”image/svg+xml” …&gt; don’t work</p>
<p>Hmm.. actually I&#8217;m unable to pinpoint exactly which embed tags work and which don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceArdor</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56576</link>
		<dc:creator>IceArdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56576</guid>
		<description>looking forward to Kestrel...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking forward to Kestrel&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56571</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56571</guid>
		<description>It seems &lt;/b&gt;embed type=&quot;image/svg+xml&quot; ...&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&gt; don&#039;t work, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems embed type=&#8221;image/svg+xml&#8221; &#8230;<b></b>&gt; don&#8217;t work, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html/comment-page-1#comment-56563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/how-opera-ranks-with-its-svg-implementation-best-native-implementation.html#comment-56563</guid>
		<description>I should also point out though that I don&#039;t think the SVG Test Suite is the definite source for completeness or correctness in implementations of SVG, but it is one of the better sources.  Performance is another concern, and Opera does beat Firefox in a lot of SVG apps I&#039;ve played with.

Looking forward to 9.5 and beyond! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also point out though that I don&#8217;t think the SVG Test Suite is the definite source for completeness or correctness in implementations of SVG, but it is one of the better sources.  Performance is another concern, and Opera does beat Firefox in a lot of SVG apps I&#8217;ve played with.</p>
<p>Looking forward to 9.5 and beyond! <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
