<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX Spell Checker in Opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-57399</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-57399</guid>
		<description>All very nice, but it&#039;s worth pointing out, if you use Opera for email/newsgroups, then you still need the ASpell stuff.

This add-on is only good for web paged based spell checking.

It would be nice if Opera overhauled the spell checker to use this, and made it work with email.  It would be also nice if it did the way firefox does, and puts squiggles under misspelled words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very nice, but it&#8217;s worth pointing out, if you use Opera for email/newsgroups, then you still need the ASpell stuff.</p>
<p>This add-on is only good for web paged based spell checking.</p>
<p>It would be nice if Opera overhauled the spell checker to use this, and made it work with email.  It would be also nice if it did the way firefox does, and puts squiggles under misspelled words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadd</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-50310</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-50310</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Opera’s User JavaScript is extremely powerful, but besides for not having an active distribution system, unfortunately installing a script with a simple click of a button is still lacking. Since Opera doesn’t support the Firefox-like extension model, extending the browser’s functionality using User JavaScript becomes vital to developers, which is why Opera needs to make it easier for developers to distribute their scripts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes! Exactly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Opera’s User JavaScript is extremely powerful, but besides for not having an active distribution system, unfortunately installing a script with a simple click of a button is still lacking. Since Opera doesn’t support the Firefox-like extension model, extending the browser’s functionality using User JavaScript becomes vital to developers, which is why Opera needs to make it easier for developers to distribute their scripts.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes! Exactly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT500</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49920</link>
		<dc:creator>GT500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49920</guid>
		<description>BTW: OSpell was just updated with a bugfix. Anyone who has it might want to download the new version. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: OSpell was just updated with a bugfix. Anyone who has it might want to download the new version. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49887</link>
		<dc:creator>sc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49887</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Mathias Brodala&quot;&gt;Not being able to use User-JS when JS is globally deactivated is the killer for this feature. They should be handled separately.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mathias, I think you can disable &quot;regular&quot; JS with a UserScript and still be able to use other UserJS. See http://userjs.org/scripts/browser/enhancements/disable-script</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Mathias Brodala"><p>Not being able to use User-JS when JS is globally deactivated is the killer for this feature. They should be handled separately.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mathias, I think you can disable &#8220;regular&#8221; JS with a UserScript and still be able to use other UserJS. See <a href="http://userjs.org/scripts/browser/enhancements/disable-script">http://userjs.org/scripts/browser/enhancements/disable-script</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49886</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49886</guid>
		<description>GT500, thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT500, thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT500</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49883</link>
		<dc:creator>GT500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49883</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Daniel Goldman wrote:&lt;/b&gt;

1) The main script didn’t pickup the changes preferences script. I had to manually change the script to turn off Gmail checking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Did you remove the old script before installing the new one?

I&#039;ve also not heard of it having trouble with the preferences script. Do you have your UserJS folder set globally?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Daniel Goldman wrote:&lt;/b&gt;

2) Why is the Gmail spell checker the default, if it requires a log on? The script needs to be simple.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The version at my site is set to use the server provided by fearphage, and not GMail, but it defaults to GMail if the preferences file isn&#039;t there. I&#039;ll go ahead and change it in the version on my site, so that it always defaults to the fearphage server.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Daniel Goldman wrote:&lt;/b&gt;

3) I think the spell checker should be enabled by default only for text areas, not input boxes. First, the image below small text boxes look horrible, and second, text boxes are normally used just for short input (such as your name, etc.), I don’t think spell checking it important there.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are a few people who agree with you, but there are also people who find it frustrating when it doesn&#039;t check text fields (and I sympathise with them). I&#039;ll leave it up to d.i.z. and Sombria to decide if that option needs changed in the next version.

If you have any further problems, questions, or suggestions, then you can leave a post in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=182282&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OSpell forum topic&lt;/a&gt; at the My Opera Community. That way you&#039;ll get more than just me trying to help you. ;)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;IceArdor wrote:&lt;/b&gt;

Aspell works fine for me. It sounds like OSpell is still undergoing some improvements, so I’ll wait until it is more refined before using it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, OSpell is having a few issues in it&#039;s current state. Most people don&#039;t seem to be having trouble with it, but there do seem to be more issues with OSpell than with previous scripts.

As for me, I have 3 computers, 4 different operating system, and OSpell works fine on all of them. Granted that doesn&#039;t mean that it will work fine for everyone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>Daniel Goldman wrote:</b></p>
<p>1) The main script didn’t pickup the changes preferences script. I had to manually change the script to turn off Gmail checking.</p></blockquote>
<p>Did you remove the old script before installing the new one?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also not heard of it having trouble with the preferences script. Do you have your UserJS folder set globally?</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Daniel Goldman wrote:</b></p>
<p>2) Why is the Gmail spell checker the default, if it requires a log on? The script needs to be simple.</p></blockquote>
<p>The version at my site is set to use the server provided by fearphage, and not GMail, but it defaults to GMail if the preferences file isn&#8217;t there. I&#8217;ll go ahead and change it in the version on my site, so that it always defaults to the fearphage server.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Daniel Goldman wrote:</b></p>
<p>3) I think the spell checker should be enabled by default only for text areas, not input boxes. First, the image below small text boxes look horrible, and second, text boxes are normally used just for short input (such as your name, etc.), I don’t think spell checking it important there.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are a few people who agree with you, but there are also people who find it frustrating when it doesn&#8217;t check text fields (and I sympathise with them). I&#8217;ll leave it up to d.i.z. and Sombria to decide if that option needs changed in the next version.</p>
<p>If you have any further problems, questions, or suggestions, then you can leave a post in the <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=182282">OSpell forum topic</a> at the My Opera Community. That way you&#8217;ll get more than just me trying to help you. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p><b>IceArdor wrote:</b></p>
<p>Aspell works fine for me. It sounds like OSpell is still undergoing some improvements, so I’ll wait until it is more refined before using it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, OSpell is having a few issues in it&#8217;s current state. Most people don&#8217;t seem to be having trouble with it, but there do seem to be more issues with OSpell than with previous scripts.</p>
<p>As for me, I have 3 computers, 4 different operating system, and OSpell works fine on all of them. Granted that doesn&#8217;t mean that it will work fine for everyone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoltán</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49880</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoltán</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49880</guid>
		<description>That spellchecker UserJS does not work in my case:( .It always gets me the message &quot;invalid response from server&quot;, on any language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That spellchecker UserJS does not work in my case:( .It always gets me the message &#8220;invalid response from server&#8221;, on any language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceArdor</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49848</link>
		<dc:creator>IceArdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49848</guid>
		<description>Aspell works fine for me. It sounds like OSpell is still undergoing some improvements, so I&#039;ll wait until it is more refined before using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aspell works fine for me. It sounds like OSpell is still undergoing some improvements, so I&#8217;ll wait until it is more refined before using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49820</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49820</guid>
		<description>Is any body else having issues on phpBB powered forums?  The spell checker does not work when writing a new message or when posting a private message.  Other than that, it is a great find!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is any body else having issues on phpBB powered forums?  The spell checker does not work when writing a new message or when posting a private message.  Other than that, it is a great find!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonlight Gambler</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49811</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonlight Gambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49811</guid>
		<description>I too had trouble with Aspell, so I changed to tinySpell.

http://www.tinyspell.m6.net

Simpler, easier, and checks everything you spell or copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too had trouble with Aspell, so I changed to tinySpell.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tinyspell.m6.net">http://www.tinyspell.m6.net</a></p>
<p>Simpler, easier, and checks everything you spell or copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49777</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49777</guid>
		<description>GT500, I changed the link to point to the newer version. However, I have a few issues with it. 

1) The main script didn&#039;t pickup the changes preferences script. I had to manually change the script to turn off Gmail checking.
2) Why is the Gmail spell checker the default, if it requires a log on? The script needs to be simple.
3) I think the spell checker should be enabled by default only for text areas, not input boxes. First, the image below small text boxes look horrible, and second, text boxes are normally used just for short input (such as your name, etc.), I don&#039;t think spell checking it important there.

My $0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT500, I changed the link to point to the newer version. However, I have a few issues with it. </p>
<p>1) The main script didn&#8217;t pickup the changes preferences script. I had to manually change the script to turn off Gmail checking.<br />
2) Why is the Gmail spell checker the default, if it requires a log on? The script needs to be simple.<br />
3) I think the spell checker should be enabled by default only for text areas, not input boxes. First, the image below small text boxes look horrible, and second, text boxes are normally used just for short input (such as your name, etc.), I don&#8217;t think spell checking it important there.</p>
<p>My $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49653</guid>
		<description>I think calling the current solution &quot;built in&quot; is more than a little bit of a stretch :) If you have to go download and install a third party item, it&#039;s not &quot;built in&quot;! This sort of functionality really needs to be an on/off in the preferences. Still, at least it can be done... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think calling the current solution &#8220;built in&#8221; is more than a little bit of a stretch <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  If you have to go download and install a third party item, it&#8217;s not &#8220;built in&#8221;! This sort of functionality really needs to be an on/off in the preferences. Still, at least it can be done&#8230; <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dim</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49650</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is great. Thanks. Going to be pretty useful instead of using a spell check program I use outside the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is great. Thanks. Going to be pretty useful instead of using a spell check program I use outside the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT500</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49604</link>
		<dc:creator>GT500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49604</guid>
		<description>Daniel, that&#039;s an old version of the script. Granted it was the most recent of the scripts entitled Orangoo Spell Check, but now &lt;a href=&quot;http://opera.gt500.org/ospell/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OSpell&lt;/a&gt; has take it&#039;s place.

Orangoo v3 didn&#039;t work in the latest weekly builds, and it required xErath&#039;s cross-domain XMLHTTPRequest script (which came in the ZIP file). OSpell is a single script that works very similarly to Amix&#039;s script, but is smaller in size.

I think it&#039;s also important to mention that Sombria (the creator of the Orangoo v1 UserJS) made OSpell with a little help from d.i.z. (who made the Orangoo v2 UserJS, based on Sombria&#039;s original).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, that&#8217;s an old version of the script. Granted it was the most recent of the scripts entitled Orangoo Spell Check, but now <a href="http://opera.gt500.org/ospell/">OSpell</a> has take it&#8217;s place.</p>
<p>Orangoo v3 didn&#8217;t work in the latest weekly builds, and it required xErath&#8217;s cross-domain XMLHTTPRequest script (which came in the ZIP file). OSpell is a single script that works very similarly to Amix&#8217;s script, but is smaller in size.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s also important to mention that Sombria (the creator of the Orangoo v1 UserJS) made OSpell with a little help from d.i.z. (who made the Orangoo v2 UserJS, based on Sombria&#8217;s original).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias Brodala</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html/comment-page-1#comment-49576</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Brodala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2007/03/ajax-spell-checker-in-opera.html#comment-49576</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Opera’s User JavaScript is extremely powerful, but besides for not having an active distribution system, unfortunately installing a script with a simple click of a button is still lacking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not being able to use User-JS when JS is globally deactivated is the killer for this feature. They should be handled separately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Opera’s User JavaScript is extremely powerful, but besides for not having an active distribution system, unfortunately installing a script with a simple click of a button is still lacking.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not being able to use User-JS when JS is globally deactivated is the killer for this feature. They should be handled separately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
