<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wii browser passes the Acid2 test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidicus</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-24284</link>
		<dc:creator>davidicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-24284</guid>
		<description>also, Opera.com reported Flash 7 compatibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, Opera.com reported Flash 7 compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawpa2000</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-24159</link>
		<dc:creator>dawpa2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-24159</guid>
		<description>kyleabaker, I too am hoping for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kyleabaker, I too am hoping for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyleabaker</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23639</link>
		<dc:creator>kyleabaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23639</guid>
		<description>@Croft, you would be correct in assuming v9 instead of v8, because as far as I know v8 is not really even supported anymore since the official release of v9. Can't wait to see what this does for the web since some sites will be checking twice to see that their pages work flawlessly with Opera from now on, haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Croft, you would be correct in assuming v9 instead of v8, because as far as I know v8 is not really even supported anymore since the official release of v9. Can&#8217;t wait to see what this does for the web since some sites will be checking twice to see that their pages work flawlessly with Opera from now on, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babox</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23199</link>
		<dc:creator>babox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23199</guid>
		<description>From the press release "The Opera browser for Wii is based on the same standards compliant core as Opera 9"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the press release &#8220;The Opera browser for Wii is based on the same standards compliant core as Opera 9&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croft</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23194</link>
		<dc:creator>Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23194</guid>
		<description>I was just about to say that even though I have no way of checking, as James apparently does, Opera 8 did not handle Acid2 properly but 9 did, so it would stand to reason that Wii has 9 in it. But there you have confirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just about to say that even though I have no way of checking, as James apparently does, Opera 8 did not handle Acid2 properly but 9 did, so it would stand to reason that Wii has 9 in it. But there you have confirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23193</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/wii-browser-passes-the-acid2-test.html#comment-23193</guid>
		<description>Opera on the Wii reports itself as: opera/9.00 (nintendo wii; u; ; 1309-9; en)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera on the Wii reports itself as: opera/9.00 (nintendo wii; u; ; 1309-9; en)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
