<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera 9.1 is out with Fraud Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-51811</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-51811</guid>
		<description>Bill, of course Opera will remain free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, of course Opera will remain free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-51595</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-51595</guid>
		<description>Will Opera Version 9.1 remain free?  I surely hope so.  I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Opera Version 9.1 remain free?  I surely hope so.  I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-49367</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-49367</guid>
		<description>carbuncle, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s currently a method of removing the question mark in the address bar. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>carbuncle, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s currently a method of removing the question mark in the address bar. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carbuncle</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-49288</link>
		<dc:creator>carbuncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-49288</guid>
		<description>How do you get rid of the question mark in the address bar? 

I don&#039;t want fraud protection and don&#039;t want the question mark showing but can see no way to get rid of it.

I don&#039;t have fraud protection enabled BTW but the question mark is still there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get rid of the question mark in the address bar? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want fraud protection and don&#8217;t want the question mark showing but can see no way to get rid of it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have fraud protection enabled BTW but the question mark is still there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-41472</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-41472</guid>
		<description>Petros, yes you can. Click on the question mark on the right side of the address bar, that will bring up the fraud protection menu. Uncheck &quot;enable fraud protection&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petros, yes you can. Click on the question mark on the right side of the address bar, that will bring up the fraud protection menu. Uncheck &#8220;enable fraud protection&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petros</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-41443</link>
		<dc:creator>Petros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-41443</guid>
		<description>Is there any way to disable sitecheck in Opera 9.10?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way to disable sitecheck in Opera 9.10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Buckner</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22813</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Buckner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22813</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Fraud Protection doesn&#039;t recognize the website for the Washington Post -- kinda weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Fraud Protection doesn&#8217;t recognize the website for the Washington Post &#8212; kinda weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoenixP3K</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22622</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoenixP3K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22622</guid>
		<description>This comment is related to the Browser Poll: &quot;Do you need fraud protection in your browser?&quot;

I think not. I didn&#039;t like the feature in IE7, I never knew it was in Firefox 2. Don&#039;t get me wrong, it&#039;s an important feature... but I don&#039;t think I need this kind of protection 24/7 on my browsing. Not all the sites need to be screened for Fraud. I like to keep it disabled and when ever I got a bad feeling of a website (or submit important information via a form) I&#039;ll run a quick check via the browser. I won&#039;t fall for;
http://paypal.ebays.co.au/secure-transaction/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment is related to the Browser Poll: &#8220;Do you need fraud protection in your browser?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think not. I didn&#8217;t like the feature in IE7, I never knew it was in Firefox 2. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it&#8217;s an important feature&#8230; but I don&#8217;t think I need this kind of protection 24/7 on my browsing. Not all the sites need to be screened for Fraud. I like to keep it disabled and when ever I got a bad feeling of a website (or submit important information via a form) I&#8217;ll run a quick check via the browser. I won&#8217;t fall for;<br />
<a href="http://paypal.ebays.co.au/secure-transaction/">http://paypal.ebays.co.au/secure-transaction/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22465</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 06:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22465</guid>
		<description>What is the name of the font used in the &quot;Opera 9.1&quot; logo ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the name of the font used in the &#8220;Opera 9.1&#8243; logo ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22438</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22438</guid>
		<description>Still waiting for the packages to hit http://deb.opera.com/opera
But hey, that would probably take a minute of some Opera employee&#039;s time, so I guess it&#039;s better that a gazillion users have to spend a total of a gazillion minutes of their time on manually downloading and installing instead.

And why can&#039;t Opera put Ubuntu dist-files on the same deb repository or even a separate one? Since they already have packages for Ubuntu it should be very easy to set them on a deb repository.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting for the packages to hit <a href="http://deb.opera.com/opera">http://deb.opera.com/opera</a><br />
But hey, that would probably take a minute of some Opera employee&#8217;s time, so I guess it&#8217;s better that a gazillion users have to spend a total of a gazillion minutes of their time on manually downloading and installing instead.</p>
<p>And why can&#8217;t Opera put Ubuntu dist-files on the same deb repository or even a separate one? Since they already have packages for Ubuntu it should be very easy to set them on a deb repository.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22404</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22404</guid>
		<description>The username and password aren&#039;t really considered part of the current URL -- you&#039;ll note that when you go to a site using that structure, they won&#039;t be displayed.  So I seriously doubt that they would be sent along with the domain name.

That said, I suspect that when they say &quot;domain name&quot; they actually mean hostname+domainname, to distinguish between, say, two blogspot sites (myblog.blogspot.com vs. yourblog.blogspot.com).

As for where it gets sent, it looks like it&#039;s sent to sitecheck.opera.com.  So presumably it&#039;s Opera&#039;s servers using GeoTrust&#039;s data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The username and password aren&#8217;t really considered part of the current URL &#8212; you&#8217;ll note that when you go to a site using that structure, they won&#8217;t be displayed.  So I seriously doubt that they would be sent along with the domain name.</p>
<p>That said, I suspect that when they say &#8220;domain name&#8221; they actually mean hostname+domainname, to distinguish between, say, two blogspot sites (myblog.blogspot.com vs. yourblog.blogspot.com).</p>
<p>As for where it gets sent, it looks like it&#8217;s sent to sitecheck.opera.com.  So presumably it&#8217;s Opera&#8217;s servers using GeoTrust&#8217;s data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceArdor</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22376</link>
		<dc:creator>IceArdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22376</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know what exactly they mean by the domain name. If I were to type http://username:password@mydomain.com/hello/world/, would my username and password information be sent to the servers? And is it sent to Opera servers, or GeoTrust servers (as said above).

How does Opera perform on ftp pages for fraud protection? (or would this be unneeded)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what exactly they mean by the domain name. If I were to type <a href="http://username:password@mydomain.com/hello/world/">http://username:password@mydomain.com/hello/world/</a>, would my username and password information be sent to the servers? And is it sent to Opera servers, or GeoTrust servers (as said above).</p>
<p>How does Opera perform on ftp pages for fraud protection? (or would this be unneeded)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamil</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22369</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22369</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/software/Opera_9_10_final_with_fraud_protection_released&quot; title=&quot;Digg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digg.com/software/Opera_9_10_final_with_fraud_protection_released" title="Digg">Digg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22362</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22362</guid>
		<description>At home I&#039;ve got a Technorati search feed for &quot;opera browser,&quot; and I&#039;d been watching posts about &quot;Opera 9.1 FTP link!&quot; cropping up all weekend.  So I&#039;m glad to see the final is actually up.

I&#039;ve only been using it for a few minutes, and I don&#039;t have fraud protection turned on, so it doesn&#039;t feel any different than 9.02.  But the changelog mentions compatibility with the Flash 9 beta for Linux, which is very welcome!  I&#039;ll have to surf over to youtube or someplace when I get home (I have no speakers on my computer at work) and try it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At home I&#8217;ve got a Technorati search feed for &#8220;opera browser,&#8221; and I&#8217;d been watching posts about &#8220;Opera 9.1 FTP link!&#8221; cropping up all weekend.  So I&#8217;m glad to see the final is actually up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only been using it for a few minutes, and I don&#8217;t have fraud protection turned on, so it doesn&#8217;t feel any different than 9.02.  But the changelog mentions compatibility with the Flash 9 beta for Linux, which is very welcome!  I&#8217;ll have to surf over to youtube or someplace when I get home (I have no speakers on my computer at work) and try it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAMAToNE</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-22353</link>
		<dc:creator>BAMAToNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/12/opera-91-is-out-with-fraud-protection.html#comment-22353</guid>
		<description>Oh man, I just noticed the Opera devs finally put yellow highlighting back into the text search! At last!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, I just noticed the Opera devs finally put yellow highlighting back into the text search! At last!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
