<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera 9.1 to include Real-Time Fraud Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yahia</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-14288</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-14288</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Bo&quot;&gt;
I don’t like the idea, that Opera checks the visited sites in real-time. I trust Opera (I’m using Opera Mini  ) and they way they deal with privacy concerns is the best they could have with this approach.
But I’ll disable this feature. I don’t need fraud protection anyway. A frequently updated blacklist wouldn’t be much less up-to-date but better regarding performance and privacy.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I think that&#039;s your personal choice -- as long as most people need this feature, or can be useful to them.
And about the method, I think Opera has done right to check from their servers. Why? Because I think a downloaded black-list can be simply hacked by a new fraudulent script or something..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Bo"><p>
I don’t like the idea, that Opera checks the visited sites in real-time. I trust Opera (I’m using Opera Mini  ) and they way they deal with privacy concerns is the best they could have with this approach.<br />
But I’ll disable this feature. I don’t need fraud protection anyway. A frequently updated blacklist wouldn’t be much less up-to-date but better regarding performance and privacy.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I think that&#8217;s your personal choice &#8212; as long as most people need this feature, or can be useful to them.<br />
And about the method, I think Opera has done right to check from their servers. Why? Because I think a downloaded black-list can be simply hacked by a new fraudulent script or something..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heathen Dan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-14071</link>
		<dc:creator>Heathen Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-14071</guid>
		<description>Good idea, but I hope it&#039;s disabled by default. I noticed that IE7&#039;s anti-phishing feature slows down the loading of webpages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, but I hope it&#8217;s disabled by default. I noticed that IE7&#8217;s anti-phishing feature slows down the loading of webpages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sohil</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13639</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13639</guid>
		<description>Daniel, Firefox also is capable of doing this real-time (Choose Ask Google Option). However it&#039;s defaulted to the Pre-Downloaded List
Also do you if it&#039;s Heuristic Based (like IE7).

Nice move on Opera&#039;s part calling it &quot;Fraud Protection&quot;

Also to the guy who&#039;s complaining, Why does Opera have to be different, Firefox calls it &quot;Web-Site Forgery&quot; not Phishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, Firefox also is capable of doing this real-time (Choose Ask Google Option). However it&#8217;s defaulted to the Pre-Downloaded List<br />
Also do you if it&#8217;s Heuristic Based (like IE7).</p>
<p>Nice move on Opera&#8217;s part calling it &#8220;Fraud Protection&#8221;</p>
<p>Also to the guy who&#8217;s complaining, Why does Opera have to be different, Firefox calls it &#8220;Web-Site Forgery&#8221; not Phishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devz0r</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13539</link>
		<dc:creator>Devz0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13539</guid>
		<description>An idea for how to better present it:

Have the beta style of managing widgets (shade of black over the web page) cover the site and have popup that says &quot;Suspected Site Fraud... etc. etc. etc.&quot; and have options of dealing with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea for how to better present it:</p>
<p>Have the beta style of managing widgets (shade of black over the web page) cover the site and have popup that says &#8220;Suspected Site Fraud&#8230; etc. etc. etc.&#8221; and have options of dealing with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13534</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13534</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really use Opera. My commonly used browsers are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neohide.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Firefox and Internet Explorer&lt;/a&gt;. However, these days I do see Opera getting better, and perhaps in no time, I may find myself switching to use use Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really use Opera. My commonly used browsers are <a href="http://www.neohide.com">Firefox and Internet Explorer</a>. However, these days I do see Opera getting better, and perhaps in no time, I may find myself switching to use use Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>i been inloved with opera since its early days, keep up the good work guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i been inloved with opera since its early days, keep up the good work guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arve</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13519</link>
		<dc:creator>Arve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13519</guid>
		<description>Caligula: When It&#039;s Ready. :-)

In the meantime, you really ought to upgrade to Opera 9.02, since it provides many fixes and new features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caligula: When It&#8217;s Ready. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In the meantime, you really ought to upgrade to Opera 9.02, since it provides many fixes and new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cranil7</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13507</link>
		<dc:creator>cranil7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13507</guid>
		<description>Just give a user an option to use this feature or not. I don&#039;t want to use that option all the time, so there should be a setting that allows me to select/de-selet such checking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just give a user an option to use this feature or not. I don&#8217;t want to use that option all the time, so there should be a setting that allows me to select/de-selet such checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caligula</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13502</link>
		<dc:creator>Caligula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13502</guid>
		<description>When can you download 9.1 version.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When can you download 9.1 version.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyhwana</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13485</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyhwana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13485</guid>
		<description>Actually, firefox 2 will let you choose to use a pre-downloaded list or use a provider (in this case google) to check in real time if the site you&#039;re going to is a phising/malware site.
(Tools/options/Security)

But as you say, by default it uses the downloaded list. Could you clarify the first sentance about Firefox at all? It&#039;s kind of inaccurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, firefox 2 will let you choose to use a pre-downloaded list or use a provider (in this case google) to check in real time if the site you&#8217;re going to is a phising/malware site.<br />
(Tools/options/Security)</p>
<p>But as you say, by default it uses the downloaded list. Could you clarify the first sentance about Firefox at all? It&#8217;s kind of inaccurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XPecto</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13481</link>
		<dc:creator>XPecto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13481</guid>
		<description>Being the actually the best browser opera seems to be criticised by the community 
just cause it wasn&#039;t the free browser at first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the actually the best browser opera seems to be criticised by the community<br />
just cause it wasn&#8217;t the free browser at first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoenixP3K</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13474</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoenixP3K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13474</guid>
		<description>Great news for Opera browser, this way we&#039;ll remain on top feature wise! But seriously I never found a site that would trigger such protection and on IE7 for example I have it disabled there.

The only way you can fall on one of those is if you mis-type an URL or click a link in an email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news for Opera browser, this way we&#8217;ll remain on top feature wise! But seriously I never found a site that would trigger such protection and on IE7 for example I have it disabled there.</p>
<p>The only way you can fall on one of those is if you mis-type an URL or click a link in an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pallab</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13435</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13435</guid>
		<description>non-troppo wrote in the desktop team blog about something called &quot;adaptive zoom&quot;. Do you have any details on that ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>non-troppo wrote in the desktop team blog about something called &#8220;adaptive zoom&#8221;. Do you have any details on that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>EC, I suppose most non-techie users would have no clue about the meaning of &#039;phishing&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EC, I suppose most non-techie users would have no clue about the meaning of &#8216;phishing&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EC</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html/comment-page-1#comment-13433</link>
		<dc:creator>EC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operawatch.com/news/2006/10/opera-91-to-include-real-time-fraud-protection.html#comment-13433</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get why Opera has to be different - can&#039;t they just call it a &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;phishing&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; filter, or at least display that word on the page? 

What&#039;s with the wording (&lt;i&gt;fraudulent&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;the fraud filter&lt;/i&gt;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get why Opera has to be different &#8211; can&#8217;t they just call it a <b><i>phishing</i></b> filter, or at least display that word on the page? </p>
<p>What&#8217;s with the wording (<i>fraudulent</i> and <i>the fraud filter</i>)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
