<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest weekly build of the Opera browser passes Acid2 test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rade</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3562</link>
		<dc:creator>Rade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3562</guid>
		<description>Firefox (on a development branch) passing the Acid2 test! &lt;a HREF="http://flickr.com/photos/dbaron/126886608/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Screenshot&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox (on a development branch) passing the Acid2 test! <a HREF="http://flickr.com/photos/dbaron/126886608/">Screenshot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3561</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3561</guid>
		<description>Prince passes Acid2 as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prince passes Acid2 as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3560</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3560</guid>
		<description>Only Safari and Opera pass Acid2. iCab and Konqueror show scrollbars, right? Then they fail.

And scrolling is not part of Acid2, so that it breaks when you do is expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only Safari and Opera pass Acid2. iCab and Konqueror show scrollbars, right? Then they fail.</p>
<p>And scrolling is not part of Acid2, so that it breaks when you do is expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3559</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3559</guid>
		<description>Asa's actually a woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asa&#8217;s actually a woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3558</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3558</guid>
		<description>Yeah. Until mr. Dotzler comes along and posts another one of those famous posts of his, like "Opera falls into line again" or "Acid2 is useless, Opera should've spent time doing this or that" and "We are the leaders".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Until mr. Dotzler comes along and posts another one of those famous posts of his, like &#8220;Opera falls into line again&#8221; or &#8220;Acid2 is useless, Opera should&#8217;ve spent time doing this or that&#8221; and &#8220;We are the leaders&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>Who's "complaining" about Gecko?  1.9 is &lt;a HREF="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289480" rel="nofollow"&gt;a lot further&lt;/A&gt; than 1.8, but it's not done yet.

Or is it impolite to check in on other browsers' progress?

On the issue of whether Acid2 is important because it checks things that "no webmaster cares about" -- that's a chicken-and-egg problem.  Acid2 is about filling in the corners.  Once those corners are filled, webmasters will have more tools to use.  It's not a compliance test by any stretch of the imagination -- there are still plenty of areas in the middle with spotty cross-browser support (even ignoring IE).  But anything that raises the bar on what capabilities the major browsers have in common is going to improve matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s &#8220;complaining&#8221; about Gecko?  1.9 is <a HREF="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289480">a lot further</a> than 1.8, but it&#8217;s not done yet.</p>
<p>Or is it impolite to check in on other browsers&#8217; progress?</p>
<p>On the issue of whether Acid2 is important because it checks things that &#8220;no webmaster cares about&#8221; &#8212; that&#8217;s a chicken-and-egg problem.  Acid2 is about filling in the corners.  Once those corners are filled, webmasters will have more tools to use.  It&#8217;s not a compliance test by any stretch of the imagination &#8212; there are still plenty of areas in the middle with spotty cross-browser support (even ignoring IE).  But anything that raises the bar on what capabilities the major browsers have in common is going to improve matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>IE is not standards-compiliant = "IE sux, MS sux, [other browser here] rulez!"

Opera is standards-compiliant = "it doesn't matter, webmasters don't care, and I know that buggy page that doesn't work"

Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE is not standards-compiliant = &#8220;IE sux, MS sux, [other browser here] rulez!&#8221;</p>
<p>Opera is standards-compiliant = &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t matter, webmasters don&#8217;t care, and I know that buggy page that doesn&#8217;t work&#8221;</p>
<p>Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3555</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3555</guid>
		<description>Obviously this won't "count" until it's officially released; but it's still awesome news :)

I guess this would make Opera the first cross-platform browser to pass Acid2? Certainly good news for CSS prototyping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously this won&#8217;t &#8220;count&#8221; until it&#8217;s officially released; but it&#8217;s still awesome news <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I guess this would make Opera the first cross-platform browser to pass Acid2? Certainly good news for CSS prototyping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3554</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3554</guid>
		<description>@ arkavat

i read that the acid test page ISN'T SUPPOSED to be scrolled - if it is, it'll always result in strange things on the screen. you shouldn't scroll that page - when you do scroll and it breaks, it doesn't mean the browser's rendering is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ arkavat</p>
<p>i read that the acid test page ISN&#8217;T SUPPOSED to be scrolled - if it is, it&#8217;ll always result in strange things on the screen. you shouldn&#8217;t scroll that page - when you do scroll and it breaks, it doesn&#8217;t mean the browser&#8217;s rendering is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3553</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3553</guid>
		<description>Aah.

This a dev. version.
Before complaining about Gecko take it the test with 1.6 (which is hardly stable). 1.6 is a pre pre alpha. And If IE7 passed it, it would be breaking 90 % of webpages.

I'm sure Firefox will be able to do the same.

And since Acid2 use stuff no webmaster cares about, is it really that important</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aah.</p>
<p>This a dev. version.<br />
Before complaining about Gecko take it the test with 1.6 (which is hardly stable). 1.6 is a pre pre alpha. And If IE7 passed it, it would be breaking 90 % of webpages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Firefox will be able to do the same.</p>
<p>And since Acid2 use stuff no webmaster cares about, is it really that important</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkavat</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>arkavat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3552</guid>
		<description>:-(

I doubt if opera can claim to have passed the acid 2 test.. as of yet.
just scroll the page and u'll see that the rendering fails.
but still its way better than gecko...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I doubt if opera can claim to have passed the acid 2 test.. as of yet.<br />
just scroll the page and u&#8217;ll see that the rendering fails.<br />
but still its way better than gecko&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milki</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>Milki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3551</guid>
		<description>Kelson, you claim that Gecko isn't even close to passing the Acid2 test, look at the 1.6 builds, as buggy as they might be they have come a long way.

I'm a Firefox user.

Anyway congratulations to Opera for achieving this feat. It has come along way from Opera 7.54 and Opera 8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelson, you claim that Gecko isn&#8217;t even close to passing the Acid2 test, look at the 1.6 builds, as buggy as they might be they have come a long way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Firefox user.</p>
<p>Anyway congratulations to Opera for achieving this feat. It has come along way from Opera 7.54 and Opera 8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3550</guid>
		<description>Screenshots always must be in PNG, not JPEG. PNG size is smaller and no visual artifacts there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screenshots always must be in PNG, not JPEG. PNG size is smaller and no visual artifacts there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Clay</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Let's just hope they don't have to roll back any of those fixes to iron out any remaining showstopper bugs. Acid2 is exciting, but I'd much rather 9.0 just &lt;EM&gt;work&lt;/EM&gt; for people. eg. more &lt;a HREF="http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/js/dom/css/" rel="nofollow"&gt;DOM2 Style support&lt;/A&gt;, no more occasional GDI flakiness...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Let&#8217;s just hope they don&#8217;t have to roll back any of those fixes to iron out any remaining showstopper bugs. Acid2 is exciting, but I&#8217;d much rather 9.0 just <em>work</em> for people. eg. more <a HREF="http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/js/dom/css/">DOM2 Style support</a>, no more occasional GDI flakiness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kL</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>kL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2006/03/latest-weekly-build-of-the-opera-browser-passes-acid2-test.html#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>Great! So that's two left: Explorer and Gecko. 
Mozilla plans Acid2 fixes for refactored Gecko 1.9, which will be released in Firefox 3 somewhere around Q1 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! So that&#8217;s two left: Explorer and Gecko.<br />
Mozilla plans Acid2 fixes for refactored Gecko 1.9, which will be released in Firefox 3 somewhere around Q1 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
