<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on Opera&#8217;s Acid2 progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:45:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html/comment-page-1#comment-2259</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html#comment-2259</guid>
		<description>Kelson,

Thanks for pointing that out. I forgot about those two browsers.

Updated post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelson,</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out. I forgot about those two browsers.</p>
<p>Updated post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html/comment-page-1#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>Nice to see some progress!  I don&#039;t expect much in IE 7 or Firefox 1.5 (I think all the Acid2 work is slated for FF 2.0), but between Opera and Safari, it&#039;ll be great to start seeing these fixes work their way into releases that are actually in use.

A point of correction: Since internal Safari builds passed Acid2 in April, &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/06/07/icab-beats-acid2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Konqueror and iCab have also passed it&lt;/A&gt;.  iCab actually beat Konqueror for second place by a matter of days.

The Konqueror fixes are still only on the development tree (just like Safari, though they had to implement a lot of the fixes from scratch since the KHTML and WebCore codebases have diverged quite a bit), but the iCab fixes are in the latest public beta.  AFAIK it&#039;s still the only Acid2-compliant browser you can just download and run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see some progress!  I don&#8217;t expect much in IE 7 or Firefox 1.5 (I think all the Acid2 work is slated for FF 2.0), but between Opera and Safari, it&#8217;ll be great to start seeing these fixes work their way into releases that are actually in use.</p>
<p>A point of correction: Since internal Safari builds passed Acid2 in April, <a HREF="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2005/06/07/icab-beats-acid2/">Konqueror and iCab have also passed it</a>.  iCab actually beat Konqueror for second place by a matter of days.</p>
<p>The Konqueror fixes are still only on the development tree (just like Safari, though they had to implement a lot of the fixes from scratch since the KHTML and WebCore codebases have diverged quite a bit), but the iCab fixes are in the latest public beta.  AFAIK it&#8217;s still the only Acid2-compliant browser you can just download and run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldman</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html/comment-page-1#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What&#039;s an internal build?&lt;/I&gt;

An internal build of Opera is a new working version of Opera that is only available internally to the Opera company -- i.e. it has not been released yet to the public.

Sorry, for not pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What&#8217;s an internal build?</i></p>
<p>An internal build of Opera is a new working version of Opera that is only available internally to the Opera company &#8212; i.e. it has not been released yet to the public.</p>
<p>Sorry, for not pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html/comment-page-1#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/update-on-operas-acid2-progress.html#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s an internal build?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s an internal build?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
