<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing browser download size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html</link>
	<description>A blog covering the latest buzz on the Opera browser and its competition.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>''Everyone is has broadband connections nowadays.''

&lt;B&gt;Wrong.&lt;/B&gt; Most people do NOT have broadband connections, as a matter of fact.

As for Opera being exe packed - even when unpacked &lt;B&gt;it's still smaller than Firefox&lt;/B&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;Everyone is has broadband connections nowadays.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>Wrong.</b> Most people do NOT have broadband connections, as a matter of fact.</p>
<p>As for Opera being exe packed - even when unpacked <b>it&#8217;s still smaller than Firefox</b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>True, Opera is small in size ... but who cares? Everyone is has broadband connections nowadays. People download fullscreen, full length movies in a few hours. No one is afraid of downloading 40-50 MB anymore.
I like Opera and I think it's the best browser, but don't get too stuck on keeping it small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Opera is small in size &#8230; but who cares? Everyone is has broadband connections nowadays. People download fullscreen, full length movies in a few hours. No one is afraid of downloading 40-50 MB anymore.<br />
I like Opera and I think it&#8217;s the best browser, but don&#8217;t get too stuck on keeping it small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>All the comparison says is that Opera is smaller than everything else out there. We all know that Opera has more features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the comparison says is that Opera is smaller than everything else out there. We all know that Opera has more features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>minghong  yes it is meaningless?!
Opera has more features then Firefox and still is smaller. Amazing isn't it :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>minghong  yes it is meaningless?!<br />
Opera has more features then Firefox and still is smaller. Amazing isn&#8217;t it <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>This post has been removed by a blog administrator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has been removed by a blog administrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minghong</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>minghong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>Rather meaningless comparison&#8230; The feature set and degree/area of standards support are all different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather meaningless comparison&hellip; The feature set and degree/area of standards support are all different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>He's comparing installer sizes, those are usually compressed.

I'm not much into exe packing, but my opera.exe is full of readable text, shouldn't those get compressed away then? What's your source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s comparing installer sizes, those are usually compressed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not much into exe packing, but my opera.exe is full of readable text, shouldn&#8217;t those get compressed away then? What&#8217;s your source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>opera uses a exe packer on the exe and dll's, so comparing to firefox is not really fair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>opera uses a exe packer on the exe and dll&#8217;s, so comparing to firefox is not really fair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>The high memory version of Opera Mini is 98.7 kB (101,169 bytes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The high memory version of Opera Mini is 98.7 kB (101,169 bytes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2315</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2315</guid>
		<description>"Bigger is not better."

But smaller doesn't mean it's better either. ;)

And as stated above, pages displayed by Opera mini are prerendered by a server. Impressive nonetheless. I hope it will be available here in germany the next months. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bigger is not better.&#8221;</p>
<p>But smaller doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s better either. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And as stated above, pages displayed by Opera mini are prerendered by a server. Impressive nonetheless. I hope it will be available here in germany the next months. <img src='http://operawatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>To be fair, Opera Mini doesn't actually contain much rendering technology.  That is handled by a seperate server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, Opera Mini doesn&#8217;t actually contain much rendering technology.  That is handled by a seperate server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jere</title>
		<link>http://operawatch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha.opera-watch.com/news/2005/08/comparing-browser-download-size.html#comment-2313</guid>
		<description>How does Minimo compare to Opera for various mobiles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Minimo compare to Opera for various mobiles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
